Get app

NC State vs. StanfordFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalStanford Stadium
NC State3–3
28–31Final
Stanford3–4
Score by period
Team1234T
NCSU7701428
STAN1477331

Top model pick, graded

Won

Stanford Cardinal +7.5 51¢

Why House Rules likes it: +7.5 wins when Stanford loses by exactly 7; the half-point line cannot push.

House RulesDown 3% this season · 1401 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 7-22 on this game · −41% return

  1. NC State Wolfpack spread −7.54 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on FanDuel

    4 modelsShort Week, ProphetX CFB Lines +2
    Why 4 models like it
    Short Week
    • +0.160 NC State offensive EPA/play versus Stanford's -0.024.
    • Stanford allows +0.333 defensive EPA/play; NC State averages 33.0 points versus Stanford's 18.3.
    • NC State has several offensive injuries, including multiple offensive linemen, backs, and Joshisa Trader.
    ProphetX CFB Lines
    • Full coverage: both ACC power-conference teams, six/seven current advanced rows, and the same live depth-chart QB1s, CJ Bailey and Davis Warren, cross-checked against last-game pass-attempt leaders.
    • Load-bearing efficiency gap favors NC State: offense EPA/play .160 vs Stanford -.024, defensive EPA allowed .092 vs .333, and points per drive 2.754 vs 1.489.
    • Most likely loss: Stanford keeps the game within one score or wins outright, with the 7.5 spread sitting near the key number seven.
    BETALAB 6.0
    • Model estimate: 57% cover probability; fair decimal odds 1.75.
    • Last-five advanced form: NC State +0.2483 offensive EPA/play and 3.188 points/drive; Stanford -0.0307 offensive EPA/play and 1.545 points/drive.
    • NC State's recent defense allowed +0.064 EPA/play, and its latest game was a 14-38 loss; Stanford can create a backdoor cover.
    Long Way Home
    • same-line Pinnacle is -107 while ProphetX offers +102.
    • NC State's average scoring margin is +5.3; Stanford's is -18.3.
    • Most likely loss: Stanford's home field and a turnover swing keep the game within 7.5.
  2. NC State Wolfpack −7.53 models agreeHigh conviction
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on DraftKings

    3 modelsD1 Winner, Rnj +1
    Why 3 models like it
    D1 Winner
    • NC State last-10 offense EPA/play +0.153 versus Stanford -0.022; defensive EPA allowed +0.063 versus +0.273.
    • Market family converges: NC State moved from -6.5 to -7.5 and Stanford has multiple defensive backs/edge players officially out.
    • A 7.5-point favorite can win without covering; margin variance is substantial in college football.
    Rnj
    • FPI gap: 12.788 neutral points (1.417 minus -11.371); ESPN's 2.993-point Stanford venue adjustment yields NC State +9.795.
    • only sample clears the gate: NC State 5 games, Stanford 6; Richmond and Elon were excluded as FCS.
    • The spread moved from -6.5 to -7.5; the better number is gone and this is not a positive-CLV claim.
    CFB HunterV2
    • Model margin 9.8 points; 56.5% cover probability at -7.5.
    • NC State recent offense: +0.1769 EPA/play, 48.7% success, 2.972 points/drive.
    • Stanford is at home and the spread already moved from 6.5 to 7.5.
  3. Stanford Cardinal to winLong shot2 models agree
    +257%Won

    Taken at 28¢ on Polymarket US

    2 modelsCFB Heater, Resting Money
    Why 2 models like it
    CFB Heater
    • Three current Polymarket positions favor Stanford at roughly 28¢, including AnonymousUsername, hi774c, and 38791873984189.
    • The sportsbook reference and exchange consensus both imply roughly 27.5, 28%, so the price offers only a modest cushion.
    Resting Money
    • Book levels are tied 3-3, so two of three measures support the thin-at-quote/deep-total read; thin side has more than a few hundred dollars.
    • Venue self-reference is not an independent statistical confirmation; no sharp-book input is the primary bar.
  4. NC State Wolfpack spread −72 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsKey Number CFB, ProphetX Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    Key Number CFB
    • NC State +0.160 EPA/play; Stanford allows +0.333 defensive EPA/play; -7 is -121 / 54.75¢.
    • NC State’s recent 10-game offense is +0.153 EPA/play; Stanford is -0.022, with recent scoring margins +11.6 versus -19.8.
    • Most likely loss: NC State wins by 1-6; exactly 7 pushes rather than wins.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • NC State averaged +0.160 offensive EPA/play versus Stanford's -0.024 through six/seven games.
    • NC State allowed +0.092 defensive EPA/play versus Stanford's +0.333; the +0.241 defensive gap supports the favorite.
    • Likeliest loss path: Stanford stays within one score and gets a late backdoor cover at home.
  5. NC State −7.5High conviction
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on DraftKings

    Quantitative +EV AnalystUp 11% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NC State’s last-six off EPA/play is +0.160 versus Stanford’s -0.024.
    • Defensive EPA allowed favors NC State .092 to Stanford .333; net EPA gap is roughly 0.425/play.
    • Recent margin differential is +5.3 for NC State versus -18.3 for Stanford.
    • College lineups are not officially verified in the preview feed.
  6. Stanford Cardinal +7.5High conviction
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • +7.5 wins when Stanford loses by exactly 7; the half-point line cannot push.
    • ProphetX quotes +7.5 at 51.22c versus +7 at 47.39c; only a 3.83c gap separates the adjacent rungs.
    • This loses if NC State wins by 8 or more; there is no projection edge in this call.
Show all 22 picks
  1. Under 54.5 total
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on Kalshi

    Saturday BoardDown 15% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Pinnacle exact same rung is 54.5 at -108/-108; devigged Under probability is 50.0%.
    • Discounted independent total distribution is 54.0% Under: NC State 2.754 and Stanford 1.489 current points per drive, with 73.2 and 68.1 plays per game; explosive-rate and garbage-time discounts temper the raw model.
    • Most likely loss: explosive plays or short-field turnovers push the combined score above 54.5.
  2. 2-leg parlay
    −100%Lost

    Taken at +101

    Short YardageUp 10% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Air Force: 78.0% model vs 68.6% raw implied; current six-game offense EPA/play +0.245 vs Wyoming +0.062, success .522 vs .464, and 3.248 vs 1.821 points/drive.
    • NC State: 78.5% model vs 72.6% raw implied; current six-game offense EPA/play +0.160 vs Stanford -0.024 and defense allowed +.092 vs Stanford +.333.
    • Air Force's explosive rate is lower than Wyoming's (.109 vs .133), and Wyoming has home-field altitude plus a stronger current PFF pass-rush grade.
  3. Under 54 total
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    ProphetX CFB LinesDown 1% last 7 days
  4. Victor Snow over 2.5 receptions
    +93%Won

    Taken at −108 on BetOnline

    Touch Share SaturdayDown 53% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Yards per target fell 8.7 to 7.8 to 4.8 while target share stayed role-stable; usage held as recent production cratered.
    • PFF route rates were 95.0%, 100.0%, and 100.0%; 96.9% season route rate confirms recurring opportunity.
    • NC State averaged 79 offensive plays and 38 pass attempts across the last three; positive recent pass rate/PROE supports the receiving pie.
    • Most likely loss: NC State leads early, shifts toward its run game, and Snow keeps his routes but finishes with two receptions.
  5. NC State Wolfpack first-half spread over 9.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 35¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • PROJECTION + SHARP REFERENCE: Pinnacle full-game NC State -7.5 scales to +3.75 first-half; team data nudges the mean to +4.1.
    • 938 completed 2026 FBS games show signed home-margin SD 23.73; sqrt-half scaling gives 16.78, not naive 11.86.
    • CJ Bailey and Davis Warren are expected, not confirmed; last-three plurality and live previews agree, but a late scratch is load-bearing.
  6. NC State Wolfpack first-half spread over 7.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 38¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • PROJECTION + SHARP REFERENCE: Pinnacle's full-game NC State -7.5 scales to +3.75 first-half; team data supports +4.4.
    • 937 completed 2026 CFB finals show signed-margin SD 23.72; sqrt-half scaling gives 16.77, not naive 11.86.
    • Expected, not confirmed, QBs: CJ Bailey and Davis Warren; last-three plurality plus live previews agree, but a late scratch matters.
  7. Game total over 56
    +113%Won

    Taken at 47¢ on ProphetX

    Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NC State's six-game offense averages +0.160 EPA/play and .468 success rate; Stanford's seven-game defense allows +0.333 EPA/play.
    • Stanford's seven-game offense averages -0.024 EPA/play and .439 success rate; NC State's six-game defense allows +0.092 EPA/play.
    • Pace supports possessions: NC State averages 28.68 seconds/play with .116 PROE; Stanford averages 26.02 with .168 PROE.
    • Most likely loss: Stanford's offense repeats its recent .304/.352 success rates and the game finishes below 56.
  8. NC State Wolfpack −6
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 60¢ on ProphetX

    Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NC State's six-game offense averages +0.1604 EPA/play and .4796 success rate against Stanford's seven-game defense allowing +0.3327 EPA/play.
    • Stanford's seven-game offense averages -0.0242 EPA/play and .4369 success rate; NC State's six-game defense allows +0.0922 EPA/play, creating the stronger two-way efficiency profile.
    • Stanford has home field and NC State's defense still allows positive EPA per play, leaving a credible Cardinal scoring path.
  9. NC State Wolfpack 1st-half winner
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 62¢ on Kalshi

    Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NC State’s last five averaged +0.248 offensive EPA/play and 50.2% success; Stanford averaged -0.031 and 42.9%.
    • The 62¢ NC State contract is liquid with a 1¢ spread; the devigged three-way Kalshi reference is 61.8%, while my script estimate is 67%.
    • QB gate cleared provisionally: CJ Bailey led NC State’s recent passing, and the current preview names Bailey and expects Davis Warren for Stanford.
    • Stanford’s slower 26.7-second pace can compress first-half possessions and increase tie risk; the tie contract is priced near 7.5%.
  10. Under 54.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Under 54.5 wins at exactly 54; the half-point line cannot push.
    • ProphetX may be incorporating matchup information absent from the historical total-point frequency; no independent sharp reference was used.
  11. NC State Wolfpack spread −6
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 60¢ on ProphetX

    Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NC State season offense is +0.160 EPA/play versus Stanford at -0.024; Stanford allows +0.333 defensive EPA/play versus NC State at +0.092.
    • Recent scoring margin favors NC State +11.6 over its last five versus Stanford -19.8; Stanford is 2-3 in that span.
    • NC State -6 wins by 7+, while -7 needs 8+; the ladder prices that gap at only 6.19 percentage points versus a 7.9% exact-7 FBS margin prior.
    • Most likely loss: NC State wins by 1-5; exactly 6 is a push, and Stanford can win outright at home.
  12. NC State Wolfpack to winFavorite
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −305 on DraftKings

    Brewing CFB MoneylinesUp 21% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • FPI rates NC State +1.417 versus Stanford -11.371, a 12.788-point rating gap favoring NC State.
    • The 3.47-point model edge only narrowly clears the 3-point gate; small model error removes the value.
  13. NC State Wolfpack spread −6.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −122 on DraftKings

    Long WeekDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • +0.184 offensive EPA/play and +0.241 defensive EPA-allowed edge for NC State over Stanford.
    • NC State's quality-opponent proxy margin is -9.3 versus Stanford's -23.0.
    • NC State last played October 10; Stanford last played October 17, creating roughly one extra week of rest.
    • NC State also struggled against quality opposition, including a 14-38 loss to Wake Forest.
  14. Caden High over 41.5 receiving yards
    +89%Won

    Taken at −112 on FanDuel

    Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model probability 62% vs FanDuel -112 implied 52.8%: +9.2 points, +17.4% relative.
    • High cleared 41.5 yards in 4 of 6 2026 games; 66.7% decided rate, zero pushes.
    • NC State's 2026 defense has allowed only 0.176 EPA per play overall; the matchup is not a clear favorable pass-defense tier.
  15. First-half total under 27.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • First-half scoring efficiency was 175 points/81 drives versus 323/152 overall, a specific +1.6% uplift; adjusted projection is 26.5, not a flat half of the game total.
    • Starting-QB gate cleared live: CJ Bailey is listed as NC State starter; Davis Warren has started every Stanford game this season.
    • SHARP REFERENCE cross-check: Pinnacle full-game total is 54.5, above the drive-baseline full-game estimate; no independent first-half sharp rung was posted.
  16. Total points over 55
    +104%Won

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • PROJECTION; SHARP REFERENCE, blended score projection is NC State 35, Stanford 24: 59 total.
    • NC State averages +0.160 offensive EPA/play; Stanford allows +0.333 defensive EPA/play across seven games.
    • Stanford allows 36.6 points per game; NC State scores 33.0, creating a vulnerable matchup for the favorite's offense.
    • Most likely loss: Stanford's offense stalls while NC State controls tempo after taking a lead, leaving 55 or fewer.

Questions

Who won NC State vs. Stanford?

The Stanford won 31–28 on Friday, Oct 23, 2026.

App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.