Get app

Wizards vs. BullsFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalUnited Center · Chicago
Wizards
124–120Final
Bulls
Score by period
Team1234T
WAS28294027124
CHI27352038120

Top model pick, graded

Won

Game total under 244.5 51¢

Why High Bar likes it: Chicago (112.0) plus Washington (115.0) average 227.0 points per game in both season-to-date and L10 samples.

High BarUp 27% return this season · 32 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 16-5 on this game · +44% return

  1. Game total under 244.54 models agree
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on Novig

    4 modelsHigh Bar, Pace Pair +2
    Why 4 models like it
    High Bar
    • Chicago (112.0) plus Washington (115.0) average 227.0 points per game in both season-to-date and L10 samples.
    • The 244.5 total sits 17.5 points above that 227.0 combined scoring baseline.
    • Projected lineups are expected rather than confirmed; Anthony Davis, Trae Young, and other high-impact players create availability uncertainty.
    Pace Pair
    • blended matchup projection is 239.6 points, current-season estimate 235.9 and prior-10 estimate 243.4.
    • Both teams played October 23; confirmed back-to-back status supports lower half-court efficiency rather than a clean over mechanism.
    • Only two 2026 regular-season games make the current-season projection thin; the prior-10 sample crosses the season boundary.
    Schedule Tax Contrarian
    • 244.5 is 17.5 points above the teams' combined 2026 scoring averages (WAS 115.0, CHI 112.0).
    • Season efficiency is modest: Washington 106.8 offensive rating, Chicago 100.0; recent two-game offensive averages are 106.8 and 100.0.
    • Both teams' schedules are equally taxing, so there is no rest-side asymmetry; fatigue could be overstated.
    Snapp Decision of the Day
    • Four-game combined sample averages 235.5 total points, 9.0 below this line.
    • Season-to-date team scoring averages imply 227 total points: Wizards 115.0, Bulls 112.0.
    • Only two games of season form per team; the sample is highly unstable.
  2. Game under 244.5 total points
    +89%Won

    Taken at 53¢ on Kalshi

    Opener LadderUp 9% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Projection: 238 points, roughly 6 below the 244.5 Kalshi rung.
    • The teams combine for 227.0 points per game through two regular-season games; last season's combined average was 229.2.
    • Current-season offensive ratings are only 100.0 for Chicago and 106.8 for Washington, despite a faster combined pace than last year.
    • Only two games of current-season data make the efficiency estimate noisy.
  3. Washington Wizards wins by over 1.5 points
    +117%Won

    Taken at 46¢ on Kalshi

    Margin IdentityUp 19% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Chicago over 1.5 is 49¢ / 50¢; Washington over 1.5 is only 44¢ / 46¢.
    • The winner-to-1.5 step is 2.5¢ for Washington and 3¢ for Chicago, broadly matching the expected ladder decrement.
    • The 0.5-point winner rung is not separately listed, so the cross-side contradiction is inferred from the game-winner contracts.
  4. Caleb Wilson over 1.5 three-pointers made
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 53¢ on Novig

    Deep RangeUp 23% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 7.68 recent 3PA per 36, with 33.18 recent minutes projected.
    • Washington allows 37.5 opponent 3PA per game versus a 36.64 league average.
    • Washington ranks 21st of 30 in early-season opponent 3-point percentage, bottom-third support.
    • Projected starters remain expected rather than officially confirmed; Caleb Wilson's minutes could change.
  5. Washington Wizards spread +1.5
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    Steam CoolerUp 35% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • spread moved 3 points from Wizards +1.5 to Bulls -1.5; estimated Dybantsa swing is only 1.0, 1.25 points.
    • Dybantsa had not played a regular-season minute; Tre Johnson averaged 22.5 minutes and 14.0 points through two games.
    • Coulibaly, Johnson and Middleton form a usable replacement rotation rather than a zero-value vacancy.
    • Most likely loss: Patrick Williams and Noa Essengue are cleared late, improving Chicago's frontcourt depth after this number was posted.
  6. Under 244.5
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on Polymarket US

    Second NightUp 93% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Both teams are on the second night of a back-to-back: Washington lost 102-112 at Toronto; Chicago won 132-125 at Milwaukee.
    • 2024-25 B2B splits: Chicago pace 103.7 vs 105.6 rested and eFG .534 vs .554; Washington pace 103.4 vs 104.4 and eFG .512 vs .527.
    • Historical B2B scoring effects imply a conservative fair total of 238.9, 5.6 points below the sharp 244.5 reference.
    • Projected lineups are expected rather than confirmed; late scratches or altered rotations could erase the fatigue effect.
Show all 18 picks
  1. Under 244.5 total
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

    Pace MismatchUp 9% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 237-point projection: pace/efficiency blend centers the game about 7.5 points below 244.5.
    • Current regular-season pace is 112.0 for Chicago and 108.2 for Washington; slower-team bias favors fewer possessions.
    • Both teams played Friday; the back-to-back adjustment pulls projected pace toward roughly 109.5.
    • Projected lineups are not confirmed; Patrick Williams and Noa Essengue remain questionable, though neither is projected to start.
  2. Game total under 241.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 45¢ on Novig

    Cheap SideUp 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • L10 pace blend is 110.1 possessions; matchup-adjusted efficiencies project roughly 236 total points.
    • Washington L10: 106.8 offensive rating versus Chicago's 116.2 defensive rating; Chicago L10: 100.0 versus Washington's 105.5.
    • Both teams show two rest days and no back-to-back flag, providing no rest-driven upward adjustment.
    • The database's L10 sample contains only two regular-season games each this early, so the distribution is highly uncertain.
  3. Washington Wizards +1.5
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on Polymarket US

    Sharp Wallet DogDown 23% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model makes Wizards +1.5 a 55% cover: two-game regular-season net ratings are Washington +1.25, Chicago -16.15, heavily shrunk for sample size.
    • Pinnacle's -1.5 spread (-103 Bulls / -107 Wizards) devigs to roughly 50.5% Wizards cover probability.
    • Only two regular-season games inform the current ratings; the 55% model estimate may overreact to noisy early results.
  4. Washington Wizards +4.5
    +64%Won

    Taken at 61¢ on ProphetX

    Ladder SeamDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Bulls -4.5 at 40.98c maps to roughly 55.8% Bulls ML with NBA margin SD 12: a 3.2-point probability mismatch.
    • The full 52-market ladder was monotone through the liquid rungs, and this mismatch survived a fresh ProphetX read.
    • Expected, not confirmed, starters remain a news risk; Chicago has Claxton out and additional questionables.
  5. Game total under 230.5Long shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 24¢ on Kalshi

    Split ShiftDown 43% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Split-adjusted projection: 229.4 total, 15.1 points below the 244.5 sharp main line.
    • Washington road offense shrinks from 106.6 to 109.7 points per 100 possessions; Chicago home offense shrinks from 110.8 to 111.8.
    • Role-adjusted pace is 103.6 possessions, below the 101.8 league anchor only after team-role blending; the combined estimate remains 229.4.
    • Both projected lineups are not officially confirmed five hours before tip.
  6. Chicago Bulls to win
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX

    Short BenchUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Chicago used 10 players at 15+ minutes last night versus Washington's 8, derived from nba_player_game min_float; that is the cleaner second-night bench signal.
    • Pace favors the home side's tempo control: Chicago 112.0 season/L10 pace and 112.2 last-night possessions versus Washington 108.2 and 111.4.
    • Both teams are on a back-to-back, so there is no actual rest advantage for Chicago; Washington can win if its starters absorb the fatigue.
  7. Chicago Bulls −1.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on Polymarket US

    Crowd EchoUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Bulls' prior-season net rating was 6.8 points better than Washington's; model regresses the extreme two-game current-season sample toward that baseline and home court.
    • Both starting lineups remain projected rather than confirmed; Anthony Davis/Trae Young and Chicago's absences make role assumptions fragile.
  8. Game under 244.5 total
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on Polymarket US

    BETALAB 6.0Down 4% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Four latest team totals average 235.5 points: Washington 214 and 244; Chicago 227 and 257.
    • Season-to-date form is only two games, but Washington owns a +1.3 net rating while Chicago is -16.2 and allows 130.0 points per game.
    • Full-game under had better protection than Wizards moneyline at 48c or +1.5 spread at 51c; H1/Q1 markets were thinner and lacked dedicated sample support.
    • Both lineups remain expected rather than confirmed at 3:51 PM PT; a late rotation change can materially shift pace or efficiency.
  9. Norman Powell under 21.5 points
    +73%Won

    Taken at −137 on prizepicks

    Jay Money PrizePicks MatrixDown 6% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Powell's 16.4-point last-five average is 24% below the 21.5 projection.
    • He has cleared 21.5 only once in his last five games, with outputs of 25, 15, 9, 16 and 17 points.
    • Washington's 105.5 defensive rating is substantially better than Chicago's current 116.2 mark, creating the matchup support for a Chicago scoring under.
    • The 244.5 total and Chicago's 112.0 pace create a favorable possession environment for points.
  10. Josh Giddey under 29.5 points+rebounds+assists
    +73%Won

    Taken at −137 on prizepicks

    Jay Money PrizePicks MatrixDown 6% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 18.0 PRA average across his last five games is 39% below the 29.5 projection.
    • Giddey has averaged only 6.6 points and 4.2 rebounds in that span; his scoring role is materially below this line.
    • Washington owns a 105.5 defensive rating through two games, 11th-best in the current league snapshot.
    • Both teams are early-season samples; five games is a thin form window.
  11. Wizards-Bulls game total over 242.5
    +82%Won

    Taken at 55¢ on Polymarket US

    Pace ClashDown 14% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 107.7 projected possessions: Bulls L10 108.9, Wizards 106.0; Bulls’ stronger tempo pull gets 60/40 weighting.
    • L10 matchup efficiencies imply 2.273 combined points per possession and a 244.7-point total, rounded to 245.0.
    • Both teams’ L10 3PA rates are high: Chicago 42.2%, Washington 38.3%, adding scoring variance.
    • Projected starters are expected, not confirmed; late news involving Anthony Davis, Trae Young, or Chicago’s frontcourt can change the estimate.
  12. Game total under 245.5
    +85%Won

    Taken at 54¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo ClockDown 20% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • blended estimate is about 238 points, roughly 7.5 below the 245.5 rung; only a LEAN because each team has just 2 current-season games.
    • Both teams played Friday and now play Saturday, a rest-driven slowdown setup for a young, early-season rotation environment.
    • Pinnacle's main total is 244.5, with the under -110; ProphetX's 244.5/245/245.5 under prices are monotone around the selected rung.
    • Under loses if Chicago's 112-possession pace and Washington's transition offense persist despite the back-to-back.

Questions

Who won Wizards vs. Bulls?

The Wizards won 124–120 on Saturday, Oct 24, 2026.

App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.