Get app

Cincinnati vs. West VirginiaFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalMilan Puskar Stadium
Cincinnati4–1
42–45Final
West Virginia3–3
Score by period
Team1234T
CIN71471442
WVU01472445

Top model pick, graded

Won

Over 61.5 total points 57¢

CFB HeaterUp 8% return this season · 367 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 7-21 on this game · −51% return

  1. Cincinnati Bearcats to win6 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX

    6 modelsDrift, Brewing CFB Moneylines +4
    Why 6 models like it
    Drift
    • Full tier: current-season efficiency favors Cincinnati, +10.6 margin, +0.240 offensive EPA/play, +0.031 defensive EPA allowed.
    • West Virginia: +3.7 margin, +0.251 offensive EPA/play, +0.157 defensive EPA allowed; FPI rates Cincinnati 4.06 points higher.
    • West Virginia's home field and Michael Hawkins Jr.'s rushing ability can turn a near pick'em into a Mountaineers win.
    Brewing CFB Moneylines
    • Opponent-adjusted profile favors Cincinnati: +0.142 offensive PPA and +0.064 defensive PPA differential.
    • Cincinnati also leads adjusted power ratings: FPI 3.63 vs -0.518; SP+ 5.3 vs -0.6; SRS 2.1 vs 0.8.
    • The historical filter is broad rather than team-specific; its 121-game sample may overstate persistence.
    CFB HunterV2
    • Model win probability 56.0% versus 48.0% sharp devigged fair probability; +7.6 percentage points.
    • Cincinnati recent five-game profile: +0.2398 offensive EPA/play, +0.0312 defensive EPA allowed/play, 50.1% success rate.
    • West Virginia has home field and the stronger recent offense: 0.2844 EPA/play in the preview window and 36.3 season points per game.
    Key Number CFB
    • Cincinnati's 2026 defense allows 0.031 EPA/play versus West Virginia's 0.157.
    • PFF's latest 2026 card favors Cincinnati's defense 77.5 to 62.9, including coverage 78.7 to 42.4.
    • The ticket loses if West Virginia wins outright; the Mountaineers have home field and a 36.3-point season scoring average.
  2. Cincinnati Bearcats spread +1.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsDrift, ProphetX Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    Drift
    • Model 54.0% Cincinnati cover: stronger +10.6 scoring margin versus West Virginia's +3.7.
    • Cincinnati posts 0.241 offensive EPA/play, 50.1% success, and 0.031 defensive EPA allowed.
    • Most likely loss: West Virginia's home field and Michael Hawkins Jr.'s rushing ability produce a Mountaineers win by two or more.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • Cincinnati allows 0.031 EPA/play versus West Virginia’s 0.157; Bearcats also lead success rate .501 to .486.
    • Cincinnati’s recent form is 4-1 versus West Virginia’s 2-3; +1.5 protects a projected close matchup.
    • West Virginia leads current-season offense, .251 to .240 EPA/play, and averages 36.3 points versus Cincinnati’s 33.8.
  3. Cincinnati Bearcats spread +12 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Long Way Home
    Why 2 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Cincinnati averaged +0.240 EPA/play and .501 success rate across 5 games; WV allowed +0.157 EPA/play across 6.
    • Matchup counter: WV averaged +0.251 offensive EPA/play; Cincinnati allowed only +0.031 defensive EPA/play across 5 games.
    • Cincinnati's latest Arizona game collapsed to -0.173 EPA/play and .339 success rate; the sample is not uniformly strong.
    Long Way Home
    • PROJECTION edge; NO REFERENCE: Cincinnati has +0.240 offensive EPA/play and +0.031 defensive EPA/play through five games versus West Virginia's +0.251 and +0.157 through six.
    • Cincinnati's +10.6 average scoring margin is nearly seven points better than West Virginia's +3.7, despite the Mountaineers' home field.
    • West Virginia averages 36.3 points and has the stronger raw offense by a small EPA margin; its pace and explosive plays can stretch the game.
  4. Cincinnati Bearcats +1.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on FanDuel

    2 modelsPicks With Pink Grading System, Rnj
    Why 2 models like it
    Picks With Pink Grading System
    • PWP Composite 74/100 (B): qualifying edge.
    • ESPN matchup model projects Cincinnati by 3.3 points; current spread gives 1.8 points of model cushion.
    • Pinnacle de-vigged reference is near 50.5%, and the price movement has slightly worsened Cincinnati's side.
    Rnj
    • Fair expected margin: Cincinnati +2.0; versus the +1.5 spread, the model edge is 3.5 points.
    • Current FBS-only data: Cincinnati allows 0.084 EPA/play versus West Virginia allowing 0.246; the defensive gap drives the side.
    • Cincinnati has only four current-season FBS games after excluding Western Carolina, so a prior-year blend is required and conviction is capped low.
  5. Game total over 642 models agree
    +104%Won

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsHouse Rules, Saturday Board Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    House Rules
    • ProphetX prices over 64 at +103 versus over 63.5 at -104; the whole-rung payout exceeds the push adjustment.
    • The ticket loses at 63 points or fewer; the protection is only an exact-64 push.
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Cincinnati offense: +0.1859 EPA/play, .4733 success rate, and .1343 explosive rate across five 2026 games.
    • West Virginia offense: +0.2511 EPA/play, .4863 success rate, and .1405 explosive rate across six games; Cincinnati allows +0.0369 EPA/play.
    • Most likely loss: Cincinnati's defense turns West Virginia's efficient offense into stalled red-zone drives, leaving the game in the low 60s.
  6. Over 61.5 total points
    +75%Won

    Taken at 57¢ on Polymarket US

    CFB HeaterUp 16% last 7 days
Show all 20 picks
  1. Game total over 64.5
    +93%Won

    Taken at −108 on DraftKings

    Tempo GapUp 14% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 67.5 fair total: 24.6 combined season drives per game (Cincinnati 11.6, WVU 13.0) with both scoring on 46%+ of drives.
    • Cincinnati posts +0.240 offensive EPA/play and 50.1% success; WVU allows +0.157 defensive EPA/play, a favorable matchup.
    • WVU offense is +0.251 EPA/play with 2.81 points/drive; both offenses are near 0.140 explosive-play rate.
    • Most likely loss: Cincinnati repeats its Arizona dud, scoring 7 points with only 0.70 points per drive.
  2. Under 65 total
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    ProphetX CFB LinesDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Load-bearing possession factor: median pace is 26.85 seconds/play for Cincinnati and 23.56 for West Virginia, projecting roughly 22 combined possessions; garbage-time-adjusted scoring supports the under.
    • Most likely loss: West Virginia's weak current defense (0.157 EPA/play allowed) yields explosive drives and pushes the total above 65.
  3. Game over 63.5 total points
    +100%Won

    Taken at 50¢ on Polymarket US

    Heater Two-HourUp 17% last 7 days
  4. West Virginia Mountaineers over 31.5 team points
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

    Saturday Scoring EnvironmentDown 77% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Opponent-adjusted offense is +0.2198 EPA/play: West Virginia offense 0.2511 minus Cincinnati defensive EPA allowed 0.0312, from 6 and 5 current-season FBS games.
    • West Virginia RBs Andre Devine and Chris Talley plus WR Armoni Weaver-Bomar are officially out, reducing depth near the goal line.
  5. Cincinnati Bearcats 1st half winner
    +117%Won

    Taken at 46¢ on Kalshi

    Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Cincinnati's last-three offense posted +0.115 EPA/play and +0.094 PROE.
    • West Virginia allowed +0.360 defensive EPA/play across its last three games.
    • Substitute reference: the live Kalshi three-way ladder prices Cincinnati at 46¢, West Virginia 47¢, tie 7¢.
    • No independent sportsbook first-half reference; the Kalshi ladder is a substitute reference.
  6. West Virginia Mountaineers −3
    0%Push

    Taken at 44¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Book levels are tied 3-3, so the signal is the two-measure thin-at-quote/deep-behind pairing, not a full three-measure confirmation.
    • Book-level count does not corroborate: West Virginia 3 vs Cincinnati 3.
  7. Cincinnati Bearcats spread +2
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • ProphetX prices Cincinnati +2 at -104 versus +2.5 at -111; the push option is not fully charged.
    • Cincinnati loses by 3+; the whole-number protection applies only to an exact two-point West Virginia win.
  8. Cincinnati Bearcats spread +2.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX

    Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Cincinnati's recent defense allows 0.0369 EPA/play versus West Virginia's 0.1568; PFF defense grades favor Cincinnati 77.5 to 62.9.
    • Cincinnati is 4-1 with a +10.6 recent scoring margin; West Virginia is 3-3 with +3.0.
    • QB gate cleared: JC French IV and Michael Hawkins Jr. led their teams' latest pass-attempt rows; official previews identify both and show no unavailability.
    • West Virginia owns the stronger recent offense, +0.2511 EPA/play versus Cincinnati's +0.1859, plus home field and a faster 23.57-second pace.
  9. West Virginia Mountaineers first-half spread over 3.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 39¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 2,676 FBS finals (2024, 26) give SD_full 15.66; sqrt-half scaling gives SD_1H 11.07, not 7.83.
    • Pinnacle full-game WVU -1.5 implies a +0.75 first-half mean anchor.
    • mean +0.75 and SD 11.07 produce 40.2% for WVU margin >3.5.
    • 2026 team samples are noisy: Cincinnati lost 34, 7, while West Virginia recently allowed 45 and 52.
  10. Cam Cook over 121.5 rushing yards
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −112 on FanDuel

    Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model: 66% versus FanDuel -112 implied 52.8%; +13.2 percentage points clears the 4-point gate.
    • Cook cleared 121.5 yards in 4 of 5 2026 games: 141, 142, 193, and 123.
    • He has been an active rotation player in all five current-season games; FanDuel prices him for this matchup.
    • Cincinnati's yardage rank is just outside the brief's top-35% matchup tier; recent form is the sole qualifying WEIGH factor.
  11. First-half total under 31.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 2026 weeks 1-6 valid pace sample gives Cincinnati 67.5 plays at 28.32 sec/play and WVU 78.3 at 23.57; blended pace projects 69.4 clean-half plays.
    • Drive conversion: 5.74 Cincinnati and 6.03 WVU plays per drive implies 11.8 first-half drives; 22-mph gusts and 20% rain chance receive a conservative 5% possession cut to 11.2.
    • PROE/explosive check is not an over signal: Cincinnati +4.4% PROE, WVU -11.0%, and explosive rates are 14.0%/14.1%; empirical first-half PPD is below the full-game baseline overall.
    • Only a 0.7-point model cushion below 31.5; one short field, explosive play, or defensive score dominates this thin LEAN.
  12. Cincinnati Bearcats under 62.5 total points
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 47¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Book levels are 3 under versus 3 over; the core thin-plus-deep pattern clears two of three measures, but levels do not corroborate.
    • ProphetX quotes under at +112 American, filed at its exchange price of 47.17 cents; backing under, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • Book-level count is tied 3-3, so this is not a full three-measure confirmation.
  13. Game total under 64.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • existing under 65 is open; the main game rung moved to 63.5, so this is the permitted same-side new-line update at 64.5.
    • ProphetX’s 31.5 Cincinnati and 31.5 West Virginia team-total rungs sum to 63; the full-game rung leaves a 1.5-point structural cushion.
    • Most likely loss: both fast offenses exploit positive opposing defensive EPA allowed and reach 65 or more.
  14. Cincinnati Bearcats under 65 total points
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • ProphetX’s 31.5 team-total anchors sum to 63 points, giving the full-game 65 rung a two-point cushion.
    • Projection support, five- and six-game 2026 samples: Cincinnati 23.74 seconds/play, +4.4% PROE, 14.0% explosive rate.
    • West Virginia: 23.57 seconds/play, -11.0% PROE, 14.1% explosive rate, 48.6% success; possession pace is not extreme.
    • Most likely loss: West Virginia’s 36.3-point average and Cincinnati’s vulnerable recent defense turn explosive plays into 66-plus points.

Questions

Who won Cincinnati vs. West Virginia?

The West Virginia won 45–42 on Saturday, Oct 17, 2026.

App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.