Get app

North Dakota State vs. New MexicoFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalUniversity Stadium (NM)
North Dakota State6–1
16–21Final
New Mexico5–1
Score by period
Team1234T
NORT306716
UNM770721

Top model pick, graded

Won

New Mexico Lobos to win 64¢

Why Brewing CFB Moneylines likes it: FPI and SRS both favor New Mexico: ratings are 7.978 and 7.2 versus NDSU at -0.331 and 2.4.

Brewing CFB MoneylinesUp 5% return this season · 40 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 14-7 on this game · +16% return

  1. New Mexico Lobos to win6 models agree
    +56%Won

    Taken at 64¢ on ProphetX

    6 modelsBrewing CFB Moneylines, Picks With Pink Grading System +4
    Why 6 models like it
    Brewing CFB Moneylines
    • FPI and SRS both favor New Mexico: ratings are 7.978 and 7.2 versus NDSU at -0.331 and 2.4.
    • Opponent-adjusted profile favors New Mexico in PPA: offense 0.163 vs 0.128 and defense -0.154 vs -0.141.
    • NDSU owns the better current raw success rate, 49.4% versus New Mexico's 45.9%, and has the higher PFF team grade.
    Picks With Pink Grading System
    • New Mexico is 5-1 with a +29.2 recent scoring margin; NDSU is 6-1 but only +18.1 over its recent window.
    • Both teams grade 90.6 defensively; New Mexico's FPI rating is 7.978 versus NDSU's -0.331.
    • College lineups are expected rather than confirmed; NDSU tackle Ryan Babatz is questionable and workload changes are not fully verified.
    BETALAB 6.0
    • FPI rates New Mexico 44th at +7.98 versus NDSU 72nd at -0.33; recent defensive EPA favors New Mexico.
    • NDSU's recent offense is stronger: 0.148 EPA/play and 49.4% success versus New Mexico's 0.091 and 44.8%.
    Resting Money
    • Backing New Mexico Lobos, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches; book levels are tied 3-3.
    • This is a ProphetX self-reference, not an independent sharp confirmation; resting orders can cancel or be stale.
  2. North Dakota State Bison spread +62 models agree
    +82%Won

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Key Number CFB
    Why 2 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Seven current games: NDSU offense +0.1483 EPA/play versus New Mexico's -0.1994 defensive EPA allowed, a +0.3477 matchup gap.
    • QB gate cross-check: Nathan Hayes and Toa Fa'avae led the latest passing boxes; same-day game coverage and roster references found neither quarterback ruled out.
    • Most likely loss: New Mexico's +0.1951 offensive EPA/play and home field produce a win by seven or more.
    Key Number CFB
    • NDSU's PFF card leads New Mexico 93.2, 91.5 overall and 82.6, 74.0 on offense; that supports a one-score road path.
    • NDSU's 2026 offense produces +0.148 EPA/play and New Mexico's defense -0.199, but NDSU's defense is also -0.066; the matchup projects competitive.
    • Most likely loss: New Mexico wins by 7 or more; exact 7 is a key-number danger because NDSU +6 loses there.
  3. North Dakota State Bison spread +4.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on Polymarket US

    Heater Two-HourUp 17% last 7 days
  4. Game total under 40
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

    Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Six-game New Mexico defense allows -0.1994 EPA/play; seven-game NDSU defense allows -0.0661; both PFF defenses grade 90.6.
    • QB gate cleared: Toa Fa'avae and Nathan Hayes are expected in the game-day depth chart; official reports rule out New Mexico's two other quarterbacks.
    • Most likely loss: the efficient offenses convert strong EPA rates, 0.1483 NDSU and 0.1951 New Mexico, into 41 or more.
  5. North Dakota State Bison 1st-half winner
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 36¢ on Kalshi

    Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NDSU's last five average 46.7% offensive success versus New Mexico's 44.2%.
    • NDSU's 0.115 offensive EPA/play is competitive with New Mexico's 0.179, while NDSU has the faster 28.8-second pace.
    • Recent game-day depth charts list Nathan Hayes and Toa Fa'avae as the expected QBs; official NDSU reporting names Hayes, and beat coverage calls Fa'avae UNM's current starter.
    • New Mexico is the home favorite with a stronger recent 2.875 points/drive average versus NDSU's 2.135.
  6. Total points over 43.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 56¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
Show all 15 picks
  1. New Mexico Lobos spread −6
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 47¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Backing New Mexico -6, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches; book levels are tied 3-3.
    • This is a ProphetX self-reference, not an independent sharp confirmation; depth can be concentrated, stale, or canceled.
  2. Game total under 40.5
    +85%Won

    Taken at 54¢ on ProphetX

    Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Both defenses grade 90.6; New Mexico allows -0.199 EPA/play, NDSU -0.066, with slow 32.7/28.3-second pace.
    • The 39.5 main total and Pinnacle under -107 provide sharp reference for the low-scoring projection.
    • QB gate cleared this wake: official NDSU coverage identifies Nathan Hayes; a current Daily Lobo article identifies Toa Fa’avae as New Mexico’s starter.
    • Most likely loss: explosive plays, turnovers or red-zone efficiency push the game above 40.5.
  3. Total Points under 40
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Both defenses grade 90.6 overall in the 2026 PFF card; coverage is 85.8 for NDSU and 89.8 for New Mexico.
    • REFERENCE context: team-total centers of 17.5 and 22.5 sum to 40, while sportsbook references sit at 39.5; ProphetX supplies the extra half-point.
    • Most likely loss: New Mexico's 39.7-point scoring average and NDSU's 29.4-point average overwhelm the elite defensive profiles through explosive plays or short fields.
  4. New Mexico Lobos first-half spread 2.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 47¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Pinnacle full-game New Mexico -4.5; conservative half-game mean is New Mexico +2.25.
    • 2026 offense/defense blend projects New Mexico 25.5, North Dakota State 20.0; reconciled full margin is +4.5.
    • 4,669-game FBS margin sample (2022-26) has SD 15.07; square-root half scaling gives first-half SD 10.66, not 7.54.
    • College margin 3 is the sample's largest exact mass (458 of 4,669); the 2.5 rung puts that mass on YES.
  5. New Mexico Lobos −4.5
    +91%Won

    Taken at −110 on FanDuel

    RnjDown 65% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Filtered 2026 FBS sample: New Mexico has 5 games and North Dakota State 6; season margins are +22.4 and +14.83, respectively.
    • Last three FBS games: New Mexico averages +29.67 margin, 0.261 offensive EPA/play, and 3.220 points/drive versus NDSU +12.0, -0.015, and 1.679.
    • Season defense also favors New Mexico: -0.119 defensive EPA allowed/play versus NDSU -0.047; the fair-margin anchor is 7.048 points above -4.5.
    • Both expected QBs, Toa Fa'avae and Nathan Hayes, are game-specific projections, not confirmed lineups; a late scratch or limitation would materially change the margin.
  6. Nathan Hayes over 157.5 passing yards
    +89%Won

    Taken at −112 on FanDuel

    Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model probability 66%; FanDuel -112 implies 52.8%: +13.2 percentage points and +25.0% relative gap.
    • Hayes cleared 157.5 in 5 of 7 current-season games, with 1,272 yards on 163 attempts; exact-line sample is 5-2, no pushes.
    • Season distribution: 181.7-yard mean and 37.4-yard sample standard deviation across seven games; the estimate is conservatively reduced for matchup and injury uncertainty.
    • Lineup status is expected rather than confirmed, so a late change or workload restriction remains possible.
  7. First-half total over 20.5 points
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 45¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 2026 drive history gives 12.36 first-half drives versus 22.69 full-game drives: 54.5%, not 50%.
    • median 28.83 seconds/play for NDSU and 32.56 for New Mexico; historical first-half drives support the possession projection.
    • defense-adjusted rates project 24.9 points before scripting: NDSU 1.86, New Mexico 2.15 points per drive.
    • No independent first-half sharp quote; full-game scaling and matchup PPD disagree, so the projection is deliberately blended.
  8. Game total under 39.5
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Pinnacle's current 39.5 under is -107; ProphetX's -103 is four cents better on the no-push contract.
    • Under 39.5 loses on exactly 40, where under 40 pushes; the selected contract gives up that protection.
  9. Game total over 41
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 45¢ on ProphetX

    Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • New Mexico averages 39.67 points and +0.195 offensive EPA/play; North Dakota State averages 29.43 points and +0.148 offensive EPA/play.
    • Both offenses are above 45.9% success rate and approximately 12.5% explosive-play rate, supporting a total above the 41-point rung.
    • Recent combined scores were 48, 20, 68, 60, 31 and 48; the distribution is volatile but the central scoring case is higher than this price implies.
    • Most likely loss: both strong defenses dictate pace and one offense repeats its recent low-output game.

Questions

Who won North Dakota State vs. New Mexico?

The New Mexico won 21–16 on Saturday, Oct 24, 2026.

App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.