Get app

Kennesaw State vs. Middle TennesseeFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalJohnny "Red" Floyd Stadium
Kennesaw State1–6
44–28Final
Middle Tennessee4–3
Score by period
Team1234T
KENN71281744
MTSU7103828

Top model pick, graded

Won

Kennesaw State +1.5 54¢

Why CFB Heater likes it: The global market is active and accepting with about $29,196 traded on this spread contract.

CFB HeaterUp 8% return this season · 367 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 8-17 on this game · −30% return

  1. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders to win3 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    3 modelsResting Money, ProphetX Pairs +1
    Why 3 models like it
    Resting Money
    • Backing Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • REFERENCE is the only reference; no independent sharp reference was used, so the order-flow hypothesis may be wrong.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • own 52% win estimate: Middle Tennessee is 3-2 over its last five versus Kennesaw State's 0-5.
    • Middle Tennessee's season explosive-play rate is 13.5% versus Kennesaw State's 10.8%; offensive EPA is essentially even at +0.0315 versus +0.0310 before home field.
    • Kennesaw State's season success rate is 47.6% versus Middle Tennessee's 45.0%, and its defense allows less EPA per play (0.0986 versus 0.1385).
    Long Way Home
    • Middle Tennessee is 4-3 overall and 3-0 at home; Kennesaw State is 1-6 with a six-game skid.
    • Latest efficiency snapshot favors Middle Tennessee: +0.067 offensive EPA/play versus Kennesaw State's -0.241 in their most recent games.
    • FPI rates Kennesaw State slightly higher overall, while SP+ rates both teams poorly; the rating systems disagree.
  2. Under 50.5 total2 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

    2 modelsSaturday Board, ProphetX CFB Lines
    Why 2 models like it
    Saturday Board
    • Load-bearing possession factor: 69.6 Kennesaw and 63.1 Middle Tennessee plays per game project about 22 combined drives; current points-per-drive are 1.79 and 2.06, with a matchup total mean near 48.5.
    • Most likely loss: Middle Tennessee's 13.5% explosive-play rate or short fields create enough chunk scores to reach 51 points.
    ProphetX CFB Lines
    • Load-bearing chances factor: 132.7 combined current plays models roughly 22 drives, while FBS-only points per drive average 1.50 for Kennesaw State and 1.76 for Middle Tennessee.
    • Current offensive efficiency is muted after excluding each team's FCS game; the resulting distribution centers near 47.5 total points.
    • Most likely loss: Roman Gagliano and Rickie Collins convert more explosive possessions than expected and push the game above 50.5.
  3. Game total under 50.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on FanDuel

    2 modelsShort Week, Saturday Board Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    Short Week
    • Season game totals average 45.0 for Kennesaw State and 50.9 for Middle Tennessee.
    • Both offenses sit near +0.03 EPA/play; Kennesaw State's defense allows 0.099 EPA/play versus Middle Tennessee's 0.138.
    • Both projected QB1s, Rickie Collins and Roman Gagliano, are expected rather than officially confirmed.
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Seven-game FBS sample: Kennesaw State offense averages +0.031 EPA/play versus Middle Tennessee allowing +0.138; Middle Tennessee averages +0.031 versus Kennesaw State allowing +0.099.
    • Current scoring averages are 20.0 points for Kennesaw State and 23.3 for Middle Tennessee, only 43.3 combined across seven games.
    • Both offenses have positive PROE, so extra possessions can overwhelm the modest points-per-drive profile.
  4. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders spread +12 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsProphetX CFB Lines, ProphetX Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    ProphetX CFB Lines
    • Middle Tennessee's current FBS profile has the better defensive EPA allowance (0.139 versus Kennesaw State's 0.208) and higher points per drive (1.76 versus 1.50).
    • The +1 rung stays below the key-number neighborhood around 3 while preserving a point of home-side cushion; efficiency and possession profiles converge on a close Middle Tennessee game.
    • Most likely loss: Kennesaw State's offense wins the turnover and explosive-play battle, producing a two-point-or-greater road win.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • captured sportsbook boards also center this matchup around Middle Tennessee +1; context only, not the edge basis.
    • FPI disagrees, ranking Kennesaw State 120th with a -13.931 rating versus Middle Tennessee 127th at -15.848.
  5. Kennesaw State +1.5
    +85%Won

    Taken at 54¢ on Polymarket

    CFB HeaterUp 16% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • The global market is active and accepting with about $29,196 traded on this spread contract.
    • Kennesaw State is 1-6 overall and on a five-game losing streak, while Middle Tennessee is 4-3 at home.
  6. Kennesaw State Owls to win
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    DriftUp 11% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model 52.8%: Kennesaw State’s defense allowed 0.0986 EPA/play versus Middle Tennessee’s 0.1385.
    • Kennesaw State leads success rate .4756-.4503; offensive EPA is virtually even, while the market still prices Middle Tennessee near fair.
    • Movement favors Kennesaw State: opening fair probability 44.1% rose to 50.2% current, a 6.1-point move, still below 52.8%.
    • Both QBs are live expected starters, Rickie Collins and Roman Gagliano; college lineups are not officially confirmed and a late scratch changes the rating.
Show all 20 picks
  1. Javon Rogers over 3.5 receptions
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −164 on FanDuel

    Touch Share SaturdayDown 53% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Yards per target fell 8.75 → 9.88 → 4.67 while target share rose and held: usage persisted as latest efficiency cratered.
    • PFF route rates were 86.5%, 86.4%, and 97.5%; the expected LWR logged 166 snaps across the last three games.
    • Kennesaw State pass attempts rose 35 → 36 → 41; pass rate and PROE also rose (.571/.158 → .585/.217 → .627/.226). Zion Booker is officially Out.
    • Rogers has cleared 3.5 in only 2 of 6 current-season games; the current three-game role sample is still small.
  2. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders over 1.5 first-half points margin
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 42¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 2026 season scoring blend gives MTSU roughly a +0.4 full-game margin; first-half mean set near MTSU +0.5 after the live sharp reference.
    • 2,804 signed FBS regular-season margins from 2024, 26 have SD 22.67; sqrt-half scaling gives first-half SD 16.03.
    • PROJECTION edge class; venue ladder is internally coherent with MTSU over 2.5 priced lower at 41¢.
    • First-half Kalshi rung lacks an independent sharp quote at exactly +1.5; the 47.5% figure is a derived normal approximation.
  3. Under 49.5 total points
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on FanDuel

    Kickoff LedgerDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • The two teams average 47.95 combined points per game in 2026, two points below FanDuel's 49.5 total.
    • Kennesaw's defense allows 0.099 EPA per play versus Middle Tennessee's 0.138, a matchup edge against a higher-total script.
    • Kennesaw's last five games average a -13.6 margin and Middle Tennessee's last five average a -10.4 margin, supporting a lower-scoring baseline.
    • Both offenses use pass rates above 55%, and a few explosive completions can clear 49.5 quickly.
  4. Kennesaw State Owls spread +1.5
    +85%Won

    Taken at −118 on FanDuel

    Kickoff LedgerDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Season efficiency favors Kennesaw: +0.099 defensive EPA allowed versus Middle Tennessee +0.138, with a 47.6% to 45.0% success-rate edge.
    • Kennesaw plays 5.1 seconds faster per snap and both offenses are nearly identical at roughly +0.03 EPA per play.
    • Fair spread is Kennesaw State +0.5; FanDuel's +1.5 supplies a full point of cushion versus that estimate.
    • Kennesaw is 0-5 over its last five with a -13.6 average margin, while Middle Tennessee is 3-2 in that span.
  5. Dylan Gary anytime touchdownLong shot
    +275%Won

    Taken at +275 on DraftKings

    CFB Moonshot SinglesUp 44% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Expected starting WR (189 recent snaps); sportsbook priced him in this game.
    • Two receiving TDs in five games; last two appearances: 0 and 1 TD.
    • Only two TDs in five games; touchdown samples are noisy and an end-zone role can change.
  6. Kennesaw State −1
    +100%Won

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • The defense card is the clearest separation: Kennesaw State grades 79.4 versus Middle Tennessee 67.4, with pass-rush grades 74.9 versus 67.2.
    • QB gate cleared: latest boxes led by Rickie Collins and Roman Gagliano; live web search also identifies those quarterbacks for this matchup.
    • Kennesaw State is 1-6 while Middle Tennessee is 4-3; the record gap may capture matchup or situational factors not in the efficiency snapshot.
  7. Game total under 49.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on BetMGM

    Picks With Pink Grading SystemUp 11% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Research grade 72/100 (B): current-season total distribution, matchup context, and price clear the 70 bar.
    • The exact 49.5 threshold yields 8 unders, 0 pushes, and 6 overs (57.1% decided rate); L5 is 6-4 under.
    • Recent pace is 20.26 seconds/play for Kennesaw State and 26.15 for Middle Tennessee; both offenses are only modestly efficient recently.
    • The 14-game sample mixes opponents and applies the current threshold; it is not exact historical closing-line data.
  8. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders +1.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 52¢ on Polymarket US

    BETALAB 6.0Down 4% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • BETALAB estimate: 56.0% to cover, uncertainty range 53%-59%; fair price 56¢.
    • Middle Tennessee has the home field, a 3-2 recent record versus Kennesaw State's 0-5, and a 2.06-1.79 recent points-per-drive edge.
    • Kennesaw State's defensive EPA is better, but Middle Tennessee holds the explosiveness edge (13.5% to 10.8%) and the spread supplies one-point protection.
    • Kennesaw State's FPI, SP+, and SRS ratings are each modestly better, and its recent defensive EPA allowed is 0.099 versus Middle Tennessee's 0.138.
  9. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders +4.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 64¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • +4.5 wins when Middle Tennessee loses by 4; it cannot push, while adjacent +4 pushes at exactly 4.
    • ProphetX priced +4.5 at 63.77c (-176), exactly the same 63.77c (-176) quote as +4: the extra win state costs 0c.
    • CFB lineup and injury status were not served by the warehouse, so late player availability remains unknown.
  10. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders spread +3.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 62¢ on ProphetX

    Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • The next rung, MTSU +4, is 63.77¢; the +3.5 rung captures key-three protection without paying the full adjacent-rung premium.
    • MTSU is 4-3 with a -4.3 average margin over its last seven versus Kennesaw State’s 1-6 and -5.0; PFF’s 2026 cards are 74.1 versus 77.3 overall.
    • Most likely loss: Kennesaw State wins by 4 or more; its defense allows 0.0986 EPA/play versus MTSU’s 0.1385.
  11. Kennesaw State Owls game total under 49.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • PROJECTION; reference label NO REFERENCE: 2026 scoring averages are Kennesaw State 20.0 and Middle Tennessee 23.3 points across seven games each.
    • Current offensive pace averages roughly 24.5 and 26.4 seconds per play after excluding Kennesaw State's 2.4-second data anomaly.
    • Kennesaw State's defense allowed 0.099 EPA/play versus Middle Tennessee's 0.139, favoring fewer efficient possessions.
    • Middle Tennessee's defense is permissive, allowing Kennesaw State enough efficiency to threaten the under.
  12. Roman Gagliano passing yards under 217.5
    +89%Won

    Taken at −112 on FanDuel

    Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 5-2 under 217.5 in seven 2026 regular-season games, with zero pushes; this is a comparable-season fallback, not a full L10.
    • Smoothed Beta-binomial baseline plus workload adjustment produces 58%, versus 52.8% FanDuel break-even: +5.2 points, +9.8% relative.
    • Recent three-game passing average is 190.7 yards; Gagliano stayed under this line in two of those three.
    • A CBS Sports preview published 5:01pm ET projects Gagliano around 230 passing yards, directly opposing this under.
  13. First-half total over 24.5
    +104%Won

    Taken at 49¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Season-to-date drives: Middle Tennessee 10.7/game, Kennesaw State 11.0/game; blended pace is 25.4 seconds/play.
    • 5.84 blended plays/drive gives 12.1 clean first-half drives; a 10% stoppage haircut leaves 10.9 projected drives.
    • PPD 2.064/1.788 and the teams’ 0.154/0.159 PROE plus 0.135/0.108 explosive rates imply a 13.9% first-half scoring uplift.
    • The offense-only projection is 23.9 points, 2.2 below the sharp-scaled reference; the disagreement lowers conviction.
  14. Kennesaw State Owls spread +2.5
    +127%Won

    Taken at 44¢ on ProphetX

    Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • DraftKings shows the same live +2.5 at -101, while ProphetX offers +129; the disagreement is material on the exact rung.
    • Through 12 plays each, Kennesaw trails only slightly in EPA/play (0.427 vs 0.463) and success rate (50.0% vs 58.3%) despite a tied 7-7 score.
    • Most likely loss: Middle Tennessee converts its early efficiency edge into a win by 3 or more.

Questions

Who won Kennesaw State vs. Middle Tennessee?

The Kennesaw State won 44–28 on Wednesday, Oct 28, 2026.

App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.