Get app

Georgia Tech vs. PittsburghFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalAcrisure Stadium
Georgia Tech2–5
11–34Final
Pittsburgh5–3
Score by period
Team1234T
GT030811
PITT31431434

Top model pick, graded

Won

Pittsburgh Panthers spread −7 57¢

Why House Rules likes it: Pittsburgh -7 pushes only when Pittsburgh wins by exactly 7; Pittsburgh -7.5 loses on that result.

House RulesDown 3% this season · 1401 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 8-14 on this game · −40% return

  1. Pittsburgh Panthers to winFavorite3 models agree
    +29%Won

    Taken at −340 on Fliff

    3 modelsNFL Sharp Edge, Picks With Pink Grading System +1
    Why 3 models like it
    NFL Sharp Edge
    • 82% independent win estimate versus 77.3% Fliff break-even implies approximately 6% expected value.
    • Pittsburgh leads current FPI 8.26 to -2.50 and PFF team grade 89.6 to 78.9.
    • Fliff -340 is materially shorter than Pinnacle -301, so the sharp reference does not confirm value on Pittsburgh.
    Picks With Pink Grading System
    • Published model implies approximately +10.8% expected return at -315; own estimate is 81.0%, still positive.
    • Pittsburgh leads FPI 8.26 to -2.50 and SP+ 7.9 to -1.1; defense grades 90.2 to 77.6.
    • Pittsburgh is only 2-3 across its last five and lost its last two games, so the model may lag current form.
    CFB HunterV2
    • Pittsburgh leads FPI rating 8.26 to -2.50; SP+ also favors Pitt 7.9 to -1.1 and SRS 5.7 to -7.5.
    • Pitt’s 90.2 PFF team-defense grade and 82.0 pass-block grade materially exceed Georgia Tech’s 77.6 defense and 53.6 pass block.
    • Pittsburgh has lost its last two and Georgia Tech has a stronger recent offensive EPA average, so the matchup is not one-way.
  2. Game total over 54.53 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

    3 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Key Number CFB +1
    Why 3 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Seven-game Georgia Tech sample: +0.147 EPA/play and .499 success versus Pittsburgh’s -.023 defensive EPA allowed.
    • Eight-game Pittsburgh offense: +0.158 EPA/play and 2.60 points per drive against Georgia Tech’s +.185 defensive EPA allowed.
    • Most likely loss: Pittsburgh’s 90.2 PFF defense suppresses Georgia Tech and leaves the game below 55 points.
    Key Number CFB
    • Seven-game/seasons form blends to roughly 54.75 points: GT 26.7 scored and Pitt 31.6, against opposing allowances of 20.9 and 30.3.
    • Both offenses clear +0.14 EPA/play; GT's defense allows +0.185 EPA/play, while the teams play at 26.85 and 26.17 seconds per snap.
    • Most likely loss: 54 or fewer points, with Pittsburgh's -0.023 defensive EPA allowed suppressing Georgia Tech drives.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • 2026 scoring averages combine for 58.3 points, 3.8 above ProphetX’s 54.5 total.
    • Both offenses are positive EPA/play: Georgia Tech +0.147 and Pittsburgh +0.158.
    • Pittsburgh’s defense allows -0.023 EPA/play and 20.9 points per game, which can suppress Georgia Tech.
  3. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets to winLong shot2 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 27¢ on Polymarket US

    2 modelsCFB Heater, Resting Money
    Why 2 models like it
    CFB Heater
      • Pittsburgh is 5-3 versus Georgia Tech's 2-5 and is the home favorite; the sharp sportsbook fair probability is about 27.1% for Georgia Tech.
      Resting Money
      • Backing Georgia Tech, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches; live ProphetX price is +280.
      • Venue self-reference is not independent evidence; no sharp reference or projection is used.
    • Pittsburgh Panthers −7.52 models agree
      +91%Won

      Taken at −110 on FanDuel

      2 modelsEPA Mismatch, BETALAB 6.0
      Why 2 models like it
      EPA Mismatch
      • 6.7-point model gap: ESPN projects Pittsburgh by 14.18 versus the -7.5 market spread.
      • Pittsburgh's recent opponent-adjusted defensive EPA allowed is -0.0234 versus Georgia Tech's 0.1846.
      • Pittsburgh's offense produced only 0.0055 EPA/play in its latest game and lost 52-23 to Miami.
      BETALAB 6.0
      • Pittsburgh's recent defensive EPA allowed is -0.023 versus Georgia Tech's +0.189; PFF team grades are 89.6 to 78.9.
      • Georgia Tech's offense is efficient and explosive: 0.147 recent offensive EPA/play and 0.156 explosive-play rate.
    • Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets spread +7.52 models agree
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX

      2 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Key Number CFB
      Why 2 models like it
      Saturday Board Pairs
      • Seven-game Georgia Tech FBS sample: +0.1473 offensive EPA/play versus Pittsburgh’s -0.0234 defensive EPA allowed, a +0.1707 matchup gap.
      • Pittsburgh’s +0.1578 offense faces Georgia Tech’s +0.1846 defensive EPA allowed, only a -0.0268 offensive matchup edge.
      • Most likely loss: Pittsburgh’s 90.2 PFF defense and home field suppress Georgia Tech enough for an eight-point win.
      Key Number CFB
      • The ladder prices seven-point protection below its empirical mass; Pittsburgh -7 to -7.5 drops 4.14 points despite that key number.
      • Pinnacle and DraftKings both post the same -7.5 main line; recent GT offense EPA/play is 0.1045 versus Pitt's 0.0855.
      • Most likely loss: Pittsburgh wins by eight or more, overwhelming the key-number cushion.
    • Pittsburgh Panthers spread −7High conviction
      +75%Won

      Taken at 57¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Pittsburgh -7 pushes only when Pittsburgh wins by exactly 7; Pittsburgh -7.5 loses on that result.
      • exactly 7-point margins occurred in 821 of 10,371 completed games, a 7.916% push mass.
      • ProphetX -7.5 devigs to 51.9% for an 8+ Pittsburgh win; adding 7.916% gives a 59.8% -7 win chance.
      • The 7.916% figure is league-wide 2014-25 CFB data, not matchup-specific; this game's margin distribution may differ.
    Show all 15 picks
    1. Over 54.5 total
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

      Saturday BoardDown 15% last 7 days
    2. Pittsburgh Panthers spread −7.5
      +92%Won

      Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

      Saturday BoardDown 15% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Raw Kalshi YES 0.52 (fraction convention: 52¢); implied 52.0%, approximately -108 American-equivalent; trading.
      • Most likely loss: Pittsburgh wins by seven or fewer, with the modeled margin only modestly above the exact rung.
    3. Pittsburgh Panthers first-half spread NO 9.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 47¢ on Kalshi

      Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • 2,899 completed 2024, 26 FBS regular-season games give SD_full 15.47; square-root half scaling gives SD_1H 10.94, not 7.73.
      • 2026 team margins are Pittsburgh +10.75 and Georgia Tech −3.57; the blended full-game mean is +7.16, or roughly +3.6 at halftime.
      • live Pinnacle Pittsburgh −9.5 scales to about a +4.75 first-half mean, agreeing directionally with the derived same-rung NO probability of about 67%.
      • No independent first-half sharp quote exists; the Pinnacle full-game line is only a scaled reference, so the distribution model is load-bearing.
    4. Pittsburgh Panthers first-half spread NO 2.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 39¢ on Kalshi

      Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Pinnacle Pittsburgh -7.5 full-game at -112 scales to a +3.75 first-half mean.
      • 4,568 completed FBS regular-season finals from 2022, 26 have winner-margin SD 15.11; square-root scaling gives 10.68 first-half SD, not 7.55.
      • At the exact 2.5 rung, Normal(+3.75, 10.68²) gives Pittsburgh NO about 45.3% versus the 39¢ entry.
      • No independent first-half sharp quote exists; this is a scaled SHARP REFERENCE plus a same-rung DERIVED REFERENCE, not a direct halftime model.
    5. Game over 27.5 first-half total
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

      Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • 29.7 pooled recent first-half game-total average: Georgia Tech games 27.2, Pittsburgh games 32.2, 2.2 above 27.5.
      • The offenses averaged 2.70 and 2.47 points per drive, with PROE of 0.161 and 0.151; both profiles support an aggressive opening script.
      • The first-half sample is only five games per team; Pitt's 38-point Miami half and 35-point Bucknell half inflate the pooled average.
    6. Total Points over 54.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

      Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Season scoring averages combine for 58.3 points: Georgia Tech 26.7 and Pittsburgh 31.6, four points above the posted total.
      • The venue ladder is broadly coherent, team anchors 23.5 plus 31.5 sum to 55, so this is a PROJECTION claim, not manufactured internal-ladder value.
      • Most likely loss: Pittsburgh's -0.023 defensive EPA/play allowed suppresses Georgia Tech below 20, leaving the game under despite Pitt scoring efficiently.
    7. Game first-half total over 27.5 points
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

      Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Pace: Georgia Tech 65.86 and Pittsburgh 74.00 plays/game; 26.85/26.17 seconds/play blend to 26.51, or 67.9 gross first-half plays.
      • Drive check: recent first-half logs average 5.71 GT and 5.75 Pitt drives; the pace estimate after a 4% stoppage haircut gives about 10.5, blended to 11.0 drives.
      • The 31.3-point same-rung reference is derived from the 54.5 sharp full-game line, not an independent first-half sharp market; this is a lean.
    8. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets under 48.5 total points
      +69%Won

      Taken at 59¢ on ProphetX

      Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Internal coherence, VENUE SELF-REFERENCE: ProphetX priced under 46.5 at 67.21c and under 49.5 at 66.44c, but under 48.5 at 58.68c; the ladder violates monotonicity.
      • Projection: only 3 points through 13:21 of live play; current live EPA/play was -0.4597 for Georgia Tech and -0.0948 for Pittsburgh.
      • Pittsburgh's opening drive produced a field goal rather than a touchdown; 11 of the latest 21 logged plays were unsuccessful.
      • The most likely loss is a second-quarter explosive play or short-field turnover accelerating scoring.
    9. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets spread +8.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

      Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Pittsburgh's season scoring margin is +10.75, but its last two losses were by 29 and 6 while allowing 52 and 27 points.
      • A simple offense/defense blend projects Pittsburgh by about 7 points, below the 8.5-point spread.
      • Most likely loss: Pittsburgh's strong season defense reappears and Georgia Tech's recent 49-point defensive collapse creates a multi-score game.

    Win chance, start to finish

    50%PITTGTKickoff
    Oct 31Final

    Questions

    Who won Georgia Tech vs. Pittsburgh?

    The Pittsburgh won 34–11 on Saturday, Oct 31, 2026.

    App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.