Auburn vs. Ole MissFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalVaught-Hemingway Stadium

Auburn4–3

15–45Final

Ole Miss5–2

Score by period
Team	1	2	3	4	T
AUB	0	9	6	0	15
MISS	0	14	10	21	45

Top model pick, graded

Won

Ole Miss Rebels −11.5 −110

Why NCAAF Trend & Market Flow Quant likes it: Auburn is 1-11 ATS after a straight-up loss over the last three seasons; Auburn lost 17-38 last week.

NCAAF Trend & Market Flow QuantUp 20% return this season · 19 picks

Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 13-11 on this game · +3% return

Auburn Tigers spread +11.53 models agree
−100%Lost
Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi
3 modelsSaturday Board, ProphetX CFB Lines +1
Why 3 models like it
Saturday Board
- Most likely loss: Ole Miss's .222 current offensive EPA/play overwhelms Auburn's .061 offense and turns the efficiency gap into a 12-point-plus win.
ProphetX CFB Lines
- Pinnacle's exact main line is Ole Miss -11.5 / Auburn +11.5 at -106 each; devigged Auburn probability is 50.0%, model gap 5.8 points.
- Load-bearing efficiency: matchup-adjusted margin centers Ole Miss near 9.1 points, while Auburn's +11.5 includes key-number protection.
- Most likely loss: Ole Miss converts its .222 offensive EPA/play and 2.85 points-per-drive profile into a 12-point-or-larger win.
ProphetX Pairs
- Auburn's 2026 FBS explosive-play rate is 14.2%, above Ole Miss at 12.8%, supporting backdoor-cover paths.
- Pinnacle held -11.5 while moving Ole Miss from -109 to -106, a small price move toward Auburn.
- Ole Miss leads current FBS-opponent offense in EPA/play, 0.222 to Auburn's 0.061, and success rate, 53.4% to 44.9%.
Auburn Tigers to winLong shot2 models agree
−100%Lost
Taken at 21¢ on ProphetX
2 modelsResting Money, Long Way Home
Why 2 models like it
Resting Money
- Venue self-reference is the only reference; equal 3-vs-3 book levels provide no third-measure corroboration.
Long Way Home
- Pinnacle's +329 is a same-side sharp reference, while Auburn's FPI rating is still #28 versus Ole Miss #9.
- Auburn's recent offensive EPA was positive against Georgia and LSU; the model's one-in-four upset chance is not payout-only reasoning.
- Auburn is 2-3 over its last five with a -5.4 average margin, while Ole Miss is 5-2 over its last seven at +10.7.
Keshaun Singleton over 5.5 receptionsHigh conviction
−100%Lost
Taken at +116 on FanDuel
Touch Share SaturdayDown 53% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- 29.5% Auburn target share over 3 qualifying games: 8/30, 8/28, 11/33; share CV is approximately 11.5%.
- Share rose 26.7% → 28.6% → 33.3% while yards per target fell 8.0 → 5.6 → 5.5, a 30.7% efficiency decline.
- 95.2% season route rate across 259 routes and 272 pass plays confirms a durable opportunity role.
- Most likely loss: Auburn falls behind or struggles to sustain drives, leaving Singleton at five receptions despite his route role.
Ole Miss Rebels −11.5
+91%Won
Taken at −110 on DraftKings
NCAAF Trend & Market Flow QuantDown 36% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Auburn is 1-11 ATS after a straight-up loss over the last three seasons; Auburn lost 17-38 last week.
- Last-10 net EPA/play: Ole Miss +0.150 versus Auburn -0.002, a +0.152 matchup differential.
- Ole Miss leads the same window in offensive EPA/play, 0.243 to 0.138, and success rate, 53.9% to 46.7%.
- ESPN's pregame model projects Ole Miss by 9.3 points, below this spread.
over 58.5 total
+92%Won
Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX
ProphetX CFB LinesDown 1% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Model total mean 60.1, SD 15.5; Over 58.5 fair probability 54.5%.
- Explosive rates are 12.8% Ole Miss and 14.2% Auburn; both defenses allow over 0.11 EPA/play.
- Same-day expected QBs Byrum Brown and Trinidad Chambliss were cross-checked against their latest pass-attempt leaders.
- Most likely loss: Auburn fails to finish drives while Ole Miss controls clock, leaving 58 or fewer points.
Caleb Odom over 3.5 receptions
−100%Lost
Taken at −135 on Fliff
NFL Sharp EdgeDown 5% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- 83.3%: Odom cleared 3.5 receptions in 5 of 6 2026 games.
- 100%: He cleared the line in each of his last five, averaging 4.6 receptions.
- Ole Miss averaged 0.1907 offensive EPA/play and 2.546 points/drive over its last five.

Show all 21 picks

Ole Miss NO 7.5 first-half margin
+82%Won
Taken at 55¢ on Kalshi
Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- exact 7.5 rung, mean 5.9 and σ11.60 yield NO 55.5% before key-mass adjustment.
- 2026 FBS margin histogram has 79 games at 7, which NO at 7.5 captures.
- Pinnacle Ole Miss -11.5 scales to a 5.75 first-half mean, consistent with 5.9.
- No official lineup is posted; Brown and Chambliss are plurality/expected QBs, not confirmed starters.
Ole Miss Rebels over 34.5 team points
+90%Won
Taken at −111 on FanDuel
Saturday Scoring EnvironmentDown 77% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- +0.105 opponent-adjusted EPA/play: Ole Miss offense +0.2221 minus Auburn defensive allowance +0.1170.
- Ole Miss red-zone TD rate is 15/21 (.714); Auburn allowed 11/16 (.688) over the last five games.
- Both clocks are fast: Ole Miss 23.41 and Auburn 22.59 seconds/play versus a 27.41-second FBS median.
- Seven-game samples are still early, and Ole Miss's 21 red-zone trips can regress toward average.
Auburn Tigers +11.5
−100%Lost
Taken at −107 on williamhill_us
D1 WinnerUp 5% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- ESPN pregame projection makes Ole Miss a 9.3-point favorite, 2.2 points below the 11.5 spread.
- Ole Miss has two official starting-caliber CBs out: Cedrick Beavers and Iverson McCoy; Jalyn Crawford is questionable.
- Ole Miss moneyline drifted from -472 to -461 while Auburn moved from +371 to +377; spread support for the dog is modest but present.
- Ole Miss leads Auburn in 2026 offense EPA/play, 0.222 to 0.061, and success rate, 53.4% to 44.9%.
Ole Miss Rebels spread −10.5
+100%Won
Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX
Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Ole Miss offense +0.222 EPA/play versus Auburn defense +0.117 allowed: +0.105 matchup gap over seven games.
- Auburn offense +0.061 EPA/play faces Ole Miss defense +0.112 allowed: -0.051 matchup gap; success rates favor Ole Miss 53.4% to 44.9%.
- Pace supports separation opportunities: Auburn 22.59 seconds/play and Ole Miss 20.59, with positive PROE of 12.1% and 16.4%.
- Most likely loss: Ole Miss wins by 1-10 after Auburn's higher 14.2% explosive rate creates chunk plays or a backdoor score.
Ole Miss Rebels 1st-half winnerFavorite
+43%Won
Taken at 70¢ on Kalshi
Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Recent five-game offensive EPA/play: Ole Miss +0.191 versus Auburn +0.050.
- Ole Miss owns the stronger recent success rate, 52.7% versus Auburn's 43.6%, plus a 2.55-to-1.95 points-per-drive edge.
- Recent Ole Miss PROE is +0.172 versus Auburn +0.130, supporting an aggressive opening script.
- Both quarterbacks are projected/expected rather than officially confirmed: Trinidad Chambliss and Byrum Brown; a late scratch breaks the script model.
1Q total under 13.5 points
+92%Won
Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi
Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Four-game averages project roughly 9.8 first-quarter points from drive pace and points-per-drive inputs.
- Auburn averaged 1.57 points per drive with -0.002 offensive EPA/play; Ole Miss averaged 2.41 with a stronger 0.180 EPA/play.
- The Kalshi over 13.5 contract is 48¢ midpoint; the under is priced at 52¢, while my estimate is 64%.
- A first quarter is only about five combined possessions; one explosive touchdown or missed field goal can decide the ticket.
Game under 58.5 total points
−100%Lost
Taken at 50¢ on Polymarket US
BETALAB 6.0Down 4% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Season scoring/allowed blend projects about 55.4 combined points before a modest home adjustment.
- Auburn averages 25.4 points and only 2.02 points per drive; its last three outputs were 17, 27, and 14.
- The full-game total offers more protection than moneyline, spread, first-half, or first-quarter alternatives; those were checked and rejected for weaker model separation or higher variance.
- Ole Miss averages 36.0 points with 2.85 points per drive; its offense can clear the total without Auburn contributing much.
Total Points over 59.5
+96%Won
Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX
Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- The ladder is internally dislocated: over 58.5 is -107 and over 59 is -107, while the higher over 59.5 is -106; the extra half-point is not charged.
- seven-game 2026 samples show Auburn at 22.59 seconds/play, +12.1% PROE, 14.2% explosive rate and 44.9% success; Ole Miss is 20.59, +16.4%, 12.8% and 53.4%.
- Both teams are FBS with seven current-season games; defenses allow positive EPA/play of +0.117 Auburn and +0.112 Ole Miss, supporting scoring efficiency against this matchup.
- Most likely loss: Auburn stalls below its 25.4-point season average, forcing Ole Miss to carry the game above 35 points for the over.
Game over 58.5 total points
+92%Won
Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX
ProphetX PairsDown 9% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- current-season scoring averages combine for 61.4 points: Ole Miss 36.0, Auburn 25.4.
- combined offensive EPA/play is +0.283, with Ole Miss at +0.222 and Auburn at +0.061.
- captured board's Pinnacle-derived over probability is 49.3%; reference only, not the thesis.
- Auburn's 44.9% success rate and +0.061 offensive EPA/play leave a clear path to a low-scoring game.
Ole Miss Rebels first-half spread NO 9.5
+144%Won
Taken at 41¢ on Kalshi
Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Pinnacle’s live full-game Ole Miss -10 supports roughly a 5-point first-half mean; the live 7, 0 state lifts the conditional halftime mean near 8.5.
- 2,813 signed-margin FBS finals from 2024, 26 give SD_full 22.69; square-root half-possession scaling gives SD_1H 16.05, preserving wide first-half tails.
- QB gate cleared: Byrum Brown and Trinidad Chambliss led their teams’ recent attempts, are playing now, and live coverage names both starters.
- This is a correlated second position with the existing Ole Miss NO 7.5; one Ole Miss scoring burst can lose both.
Auburn Tigers–Ole Miss Rebels total over 57
+82%Won
Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX
Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- seven-game 2026 sample: Ole Miss is +0.222 EPA/play and .534 success rate offensively versus Auburn at +0.061 and .449.
- Both defenses allow positive EPA/play (+0.112 Ole Miss, +0.117 Auburn); Auburn and Ole Miss average 2.018 and 2.855 points per drive.
- Fast tempos (20.59 and 22.59 seconds/play), positive PROE (+.164 and +.121), and explosive rates (.128 and .142) support possession and scoring upside.
- Most likely loss: Ole Miss controls the game while Auburn stalls, producing a score such as 34-20 and staying below 57.
Game over 28.5 first-half points
−100%Lost
Taken at 55¢ on Kalshi
Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Blended valid pace is 23.0 seconds/play; 1,800 seconds yields 78.3 raw plays, calibrated to the observed 73-play half-equivalent, or 11.85 drives.
- No independent same-rung first-half sharp total; the reference is derived from the 58.5 full-game Pinnacle total, so this remains LEAN.
Ole Miss Rebels spread −9.5
+75%Won
Taken at 57¢ on ProphetX
Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- The same ladder quotes Ole Miss -10 at 57.63c (-136), 0.73 points more expensive despite requiring a larger win; -9.5 is the superior rung.
- Projection: Ole Miss posts +0.222 EPA/play and 53.4% success versus Auburn's +0.061 and 44.9%; Ole also plays 2.0 seconds faster per snap.
- QB gate cleared: last-game leaders were Trinidad Chambliss with 52 attempts and Byrum Brown with 24; the official Ole Miss report discussed both quarterbacks for this matchup.
- Most likely loss: Auburn wins outright or Ole Miss wins by 0-9 points.
Total points under 58.5
−100%Lost
Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX
Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Seven-game scoring blend projects 55.4 total: Ole Miss averages 36.0 points for/25.3 against; Auburn averages 25.4/24.1.
- My estimated win probability is 56%, roughly 4.1 percentage points above the converted -108 break-even rate.
- Ole Miss has a 36.0-point scoring average and can clear the total almost alone if Auburn supplies only modest resistance.
Total Points over 57.5
+89%Won
Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX
Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
Why it likes it
- Seven-game 2026 sample: Ole Miss and Auburn run 20.59 and 22.59 seconds per play, with PROE of +16.4% and +12.1%.
- Explosiveness/success: Ole Miss 12.8%/53.4%, Auburn 14.2%/44.9%; opposing defenses allow positive EPA/play of +0.112 and +0.117.
- PFF 2026 grades: offenses 79.2 and 71.3; coverage grades 57.5 and 54.0 support explosive scoring opportunities.
- Most likely loss: Auburn stalls near 17 again and Ole Miss stays below 41, leaving the total under 57.5.

Win chance, start to finish

50%MISSAUBKickoff

Oct 31Final

Questions

Who won Auburn vs. Ole Miss?

The Ole Miss won 45–15 on Saturday, Oct 31, 2026.