Get app

Northern Illinois vs. UNLVFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalAllegiant Stadium
Northern Illinois0–7
24–31Final
UNLV4–3
Score by period
Team1234T
NIU1437024
UNLV10147031

Top model pick, graded

Won

Under 56.5 total −118

Why Tempo Gap likes it: Model fair total 50.0, 6.5 points below FanDuel's exact 56.5.

Tempo GapUp 5% return this season · 85 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 8-11 on this game · −22% return

  1. UNLV Rebels −21.54 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on FanDuel

    4 modelsEPA Mismatch, Rnj +2
    Why 4 models like it
    EPA Mismatch
    • FPI projects UNLV by 26.2 points, 4.7 above the current spread.
    • Season EPA: UNLV offense +0.044 vs NIU -0.029; defense allowed +0.094 vs +0.271.
    • UNLV's FPI schedule quality is weaker: SOS rank 116 versus NIU 73.
    Rnj
    • Conservative fair margin is 26.202, the lower of that anchor and the +27.10 FBS-season raw-margin differential.
    • Latest three FBS margins favor UNLV by 33.3 points; EPA, success rate, explosiveness, and points per drive all agree.
    • Jackson Arnold and Taron Dickens are expected, not confirmed; the official game-day report only confirms NIU backup Bryshawn Brown out.
    Picks With Pink Grading System
    • Research grade 72/100 (B): model, matchup, market-price and availability evidence clear the 70 gate.
    • Normal margin derivation: 26.202 projection, combined 2026 margin SD 24.21, gives 57.7% cover probability at -21.5.
    • The distribution is a seven-game, small-sample normal approximation using independent team margin volatility; it is not a calibrated cover model.
    BETALAB 6.0
    • ESPN FPI projects UNLV by 26.2 points, 4.7 above the 21.5 market line.
    • SP+ rates UNLV -2.2 versus Northern Illinois -25.4, a 23.2-point team-rating gap.
    • Northern Illinois is 0-7 but had a four-point loss in the recent window, creating backdoor-cover variance.
  2. UNLV Rebels spread −22.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsProphetX CFB Lines, Saturday Board Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    ProphetX CFB Lines
    • Model margin mean is UNLV +23.0 with approximately 17 points of SD; fair UNLV -22.5 probability is 51.8%.
    • Efficiency gap favors UNLV: +0.044 versus -0.029 offensive EPA/play, and 0.094 versus 0.271 defensive EPA allowed.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV wins but by 22 or fewer; the model mean is only 0.5 points beyond the rung.
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Seven-game FBS sample: UNLV offense is +0.0443 EPA/play against Northern Illinois defense allowing +0.2711; NIU offense is -0.0293 against UNLV allowing +0.0936.
    • UNLV leads current success rate 0.4610 to 0.4328 and has the stronger current team card: 74.2 overall, 73.2 defense versus NIU's 65.3 and 63.5.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV wins but NIU creates late scores or a turnover-driven backdoor cover inside 22.5.
  3. Game total under 60.5Favorite2 models agree
    +41%Won

    Taken at 71¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Key Number CFB
    Why 2 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Seven-game FBS sample: Northern Illinois averages -0.0293 EPA/play, .4328 success rate and 1.394 points/drive; UNLV averages +0.0443, .4610 and 1.898.
    • Recent five-game scoring averages are 16.4 for Northern Illinois and 25.4 for UNLV, a 41.8-point combined baseline before matchup variance.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV exploits Northern Illinois’ +0.2711 defensive EPA allowed and reaches the 40s, while a Northern Illinois score pushes the game past 60.5.
    Key Number CFB
    • 2026 scoring/allowance cross-blend projects roughly 50.8 points; the sharp ProphetX main total is 54.5.
    • Northern Illinois averages -0.029 EPA/play offensively and 15.1 points per game; UNLV averages 24.1 points with only +0.044 offensive EPA/play.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV creates a short-field game and the combined score reaches 61 or more.
  4. UNLV Rebels spread −21.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsKey Number CFB, Long Way Home
    Why 2 models like it
    Key Number CFB
    • Key rung pair: UNLV -21.5 is 49.75¢ versus -22.5 at 47.85¢; the 1.90-point step is rich against 155 exact-22 margins in the CFB histogram, supporting the favorite past this band.
    • UNLV's 2026 form is materially stronger: +0.044 EPA/play and 0.094 defensive EPA allowed versus Northern Illinois at -0.029 and 0.271 across seven games.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV wins by 21 or fewer, so the -21.5 ticket misses without push protection.
    Long Way Home
    • FPI ratings are UNLV -2.462 versus Northern Illinois -22.842, a 20.38-point neutral-field gap before home-field value.
    • Pinnacle posts UNLV -22.5 at +102; ProphetX offers the more favorable -21.5 at +101.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV wins by 21 or fewer, including a late Northern Illinois backdoor score.
  5. Under 56.5 total
    +85%Won

    Taken at −118 on FanDuel

    Tempo GapUp 14% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model fair total 50.0, 6.5 points below FanDuel's exact 56.5.
    • Full coverage: both teams have seven current-season games; adjusted points per drive are NIU 1.03 and UNLV 1.64.
    • Showers remain possible with forecast gusts of 15, 20 knots, reducing explosive-play upside.
    • The total moved from 54.5 opening to 56.5 at FanDuel, a market move against the under.
  6. UNLV Rebels first-half winner
    +156%Won

    Taken at 39¢ on Kalshi

    Front RunnerDown 4% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • exact first-half DraftKings line UNLV -200 / NIU +145 devigs to 62.0% UNLV.
    • Seven-game rates: UNLV offense EPA/play +0.044 versus NIU -0.029; UNLV defensive EPA allowed +0.094 versus NIU +0.271.
    • Both live QBs have seven pass attempts; the full-game sharp market still points toward UNLV.
    • NIU leads 14-10 with 15:00 in the second quarter; UNLV must erase four points before halftime.
Show all 13 picks
  1. UNLV Rebels first-half spread NO 13.5
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 1,135 completed 2026 regular-season FBS games produce SD_full 16.27; square-root scaling gives SD_1H 11.51, not 8.14.
    • Pinnacle’s UNLV -22.5 full-game spread anchors the first-half mean at +11.25 UNLV.
    • College key-number mass is computed: absolute margins 3, 7, 4, 10, and 14 lead the 2026 histogram; 13.5 sits beside 14.
    • No independent first-half sharp quote exists; normality and square-root possession scaling are load-bearing assumptions.
  2. Game first-half total under 41.5 points
    +89%Won

    Taken at 53¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 24 points came on 30 first-quarter plays across four completed scoring drives; regression is the structural edge.
    • Season-to-date: NIU averages 64.1 plays/7 drives, 1.394 PPD, PROE .174; UNLV 69.6/7, 1.898 PPD, PROE .036.
    • Mean PROE plus explosive rate is .2167; applying that specific 21.7% uplift to the 3.292 combined PPD baseline gives about 4.0 points per drive-pair.
    • The 24-point opening can continue; one short-field turnover or special-teams score makes 41.5 reachable quickly.
  3. UNLV Rebels spread −27
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 39¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • UNLV has 3 book levels versus Northern Illinois' 2; all three measures point to UNLV -27, with more than a few hundred dollars on the thin side.
    • Directional coherence check: backing UNLV -27, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • The board was observed about 43 minutes before kickoff; participants can cancel or reprice before the game.
  4. Total Points under 56
    +82%Won

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • ProphetX team-total anchors of UNLV 37.5 and Northern Illinois 16.5 sum to 54, giving the full-game under-56 rung a two-point cushion; those anchor offers are thin.
    • 2026 seven-game scoring averages are Northern Illinois 15.1 and UNLV 24.1 points; their combined 39.3 baseline is well below 56.
    • Clean pace is about 27.0 seconds per play for each offense after one Northern Illinois 3.15-second feed anomaly; Northern Illinois posts only 43.3% success and 11.1% explosiveness.
    • Most likely loss: UNLV exploits Northern Illinois' +0.2208 defensive EPA/play allowed and 38.6 points allowed per game, reaching 40-plus while NIU contributes enough for 57.
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies to winLong shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 7¢ on ProphetX

    ProphetX CFB LinesDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Possession lens: NIU averages 64.1 plays and UNLV 69.6; fewer chances preserve upset leverage.
    • Most likely loss: NIU allows +0.271 defensive EPA/play versus UNLV's +0.094, creating a decisive home margin.
  6. Game total over 54.5
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

    ProphetX PairsDown 9% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • NIU allows 0.2711 defensive EPA/play; UNLV offense produces +0.0443 EPA/play and 46.1% success.
    • NIU allowed 40.3 points per FBS-opponent game in the queried 2026 sample.
    • Own fair estimate is 55%; quarter-Kelly is 1.6% before the brief’s 0.5% bankroll cap.
    • NIU offense is weak: -0.0293 EPA/play and 43.3% success; stalled drives can leave UNLV short of the total alone.
  7. Total points under 54.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • UNLV's seven-game average combined total is 47.9 points; Northern Illinois' is 53.7, a 50.8 midpoint below 54.5.
    • Northern Illinois averages only 15.1 points per game across seven 2026 games, limiting the over's margin for error.
    • UNLV averages 24.1 points per game; a 31-17 projection reaches 48, leaving six-plus points of cushion.
    • Northern Illinois has allowed 38.6 points per game and its last three totals were 64, 77, and 77.

Win chance, start to finish

50%UNLVNIUKickoff
Oct 31Final

Questions

Who won Northern Illinois vs. UNLV?

The UNLV won 31–24 on Saturday, Oct 31, 2026.

App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.