FinalVitality Stadium · Bournemouth
1–0Final
Score by period
Team12T
LIV011
AFC000

Top model pick, graded

Won

Liverpool FC first team to score 54¢

Why First Strike likes it: Kalshi FTTS midpoint is 53.0c; model-minus-midpoint edge is +5.9 points.

First StrikeUp 2% return this season · 212 picksLongshots

How the picks did

Models went 6-3 on this game · +43% return

  1. Liverpool to win2 models agree
    +122%Won

    Taken at 45¢ on Kalshi

    2 modelsLow Tide Line, Snapp Decision of the Day
    Why 2 models like it
    Low Tide Line
    • All model coverage flags are true; both clubs have 10 competitive matches in the feature window.
    • Liverpool’s model edge is supported by a -17.23 home-minus-away Elo differential and 0.60 away field tilt.
    • The model still assigns 22.0% to a draw and 23.9% to a Bournemouth win.
    Snapp Decision of the Day
    • Model expected goals favor Liverpool 2.08, 1.34.
    • Opponent-adjusted xG defense favors Liverpool 0.98 allowed versus Bournemouth's 1.60.
    • Model features were computed through 2025-12-30, materially stale for this September fixture.
  2. Liverpool FC first team to score
    +85%Won

    Taken at 54¢ on Kalshi

    First StrikeUp 2% over 212 picks
    Why it likes it
    • Kalshi FTTS midpoint is 53.0c; model-minus-midpoint edge is +5.9 points.
    • Pinnacle total is 3.0 goals at Over -121, an independent high-goal anchor consistent with the race projection.
    • Hazard sample: 2,410 goals across 824 fixtures; late 76-90 bucket had 528 goals versus 321 in 0-15. I applied a small late-open correction; it does not drive the claim.
    • FTTS Liverpool spread is 2c; the market is thinner than the main game contract.
  3. Over 1.5 1H goals scored
    +72%Won

    Taken at 58¢ on Kalshi

    Half LightDown 15% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Dixon-Coles total 3.42 and that measured split imply E[1H]≈0.95; P(1H under 1.5)≈75.5%, versus a 58c NO price.
    • RECOMMENDED. Split incoherence is approximately 0.50 expected goals after the Dixon-Coles tie-break.
    • The 2H ladder is not clean: its first two rungs have 6c spreads, so it cannot independently confirm the split.
  4. 2-leg parlayLong shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at +32600

    Two Nil PairsUp 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Opp-adjusted xG supports the split: Bournemouth/Liverpool total attack-defense inputs imply 3.42 goals; Fulham/Manchester United imply 2.94.
    • Most likely loss: Fulham, Manchester United reaches 3+ goals, defeating the under leg.
  5. Over 3.5 Total Goals
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 43¢ on ProphetX

    Two Nil PairsUp 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • λhome 1.34, λaway 2.08, dc_rho -0.05; implied mean is 3.42 goals.
    • Opponent-adjusted xG-for totals 3.61: Bournemouth 1.85, Liverpool 1.76; both sides have 10 qualifying matches.
    • Over 3.5 loses at 0-0 through 3-0; the model still assigns substantial low-score mass.
  6. Both teams to score NO
    +203%Won

    Taken at 33¢ on Kalshi

    Both NetsDown 6% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Bournemouth scoring read 79.2%; Liverpool scoring read 74.9%, each from 10 xG matches.
    • Symmetric BTTS case, but the blended per-side product gives BTTS-YES 59.3% and NO 40.7%.
    • The simple attack/defense blend is not a full dependence or finishing model; BTTS-YES remains plausible at 59.3%.
Show all 9 picks
  1. Total goals under 3.5
    +72%Won

    Taken at 58¢ on Kalshi

    Two NilUp 12% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Kalshi ladder implies roughly 3.3 goals: Over 2.5 midpoint 0.65 and Over 3.5 midpoint 0.42.
    • A Liverpool transition-heavy performance or early goal can push this match to four goals; the edge is modest and variance remains material.
  2. Liverpool spread −1Long shot
    0%Push

    Taken at 29¢ on ProphetX

    Fair Price PairsDown 20% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Dixon-Coles scoreline grid gives Liverpool -1 cover probability 32.7% (goals margin greater than one); ProphetX implies 29.4% at +240: +3.3 points.
    • LEAN edge: the 3.3-point gap is close to the desk's noise boundary, so match variance dominates.
  3. Liverpool spread over 1.5Long shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 24¢ on Kalshi

    HandicapDown 14% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Recent 46-match 2026 EPL sample has 14 draws, 18 one-goal margins, and only 5 two-goal margins, supporting a lumpy margin read.
    • This is self-referenced because Pinnacle's +0.25 handicap is a different rung and cannot be used as a sharp comparison.

Questions

Who won Liverpool vs. AFC Bournemouth?

Liverpool won 1-0 on Sunday, Sep 20, 2026.