FinalWallace Wade Stadium
Stanford1-1
7–35Final
Duke2-0
Score by period
Team1234T
STAN07007
DUKE01414735

Top model pick, graded

Won

Duke −10 spread 50¢

House RulesDown 3% this season · 1403 picks

How the picks did

Models went 5-7 on this game · −22% return

  1. Stanford Cardinal to winLong shot2 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 24¢ on Polymarket

    2 modelsCFB Heater, Resting Money
    Why 2 models like it
    CFB Heater
      • Duke is 2-0 and recent advanced form is materially better: +0.18 offensive EPA/play versus Stanford at -0.02.
      Resting Money
      • Directional check: backing Stanford Cardinal, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
      • Book-level count does not corroborate the Stanford side: both sides show 3 levels.
    • 3-leg parlay
      −100%Lost

      Taken at −135

      Short YardageUp 10% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Texas A&M -850 DK (89.5% raw) vs 93.0% model; current 2-game defense EPA allowed -0.34 and PFF overall 91.3.
      • Duke -395 DK (79.8% raw) vs 84.5% model; Stanford's current defense EPA allowed is +0.45 with 1.35 points per drive.
      • Virginia -410 DK (80.4% raw) vs 83.5% model; Cavaliers pair -0.29 defensive EPA allowed with a 97.0 PFF overall grade.
      • Kentucky's current offense EPA is +0.20 versus Texas A&M's +0.13, creating a backdoor risk despite the Aggies' defensive gap.
    • Game total over 51
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    • Duke −10 spread
      +100%Won

      Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    • Stanford Cardinal spread +10
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

      Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • QB gate cleared: Davis Warren led Stanford with 41 attempts; Duke's Walker Eget led with 21 and is listed by Duke.
      • Duke's 2026 EPA edge is substantial: offense +0.13, defense allowed -0.07 versus Stanford -0.02/+0.45.
    • Benji Blackburn over 4.5 receptions
      −100%Lost

      Taken at −132 on FanDuel

      Touch Share SaturdayDown 53% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Target-share proxy rose from 11/34 (32.4%) to 18/42 (42.9%) across 2 games; CV is approximately 14%.
      • Receiving yards per catch fell from 9.8 to 7.4 (-24.5%) while opportunity share rose: usage-production divergence.
      • Stanford is a 9.5-point underdog, a pass-script lean without the brief's greater-than-24-point blowout concern.
      • Only 2 current-season games; this is PARTIAL coverage and the two-game cap requires 0.5u.
    Show all 11 picks
    1. Duke Blue Devils 1H spread NO 6.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 49¢ on Kalshi

      Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • PROJECTION, 2026 data gives Duke 2.38 points/drive versus Stanford 1.35 across two games per team; projected first-half mean is 5.5.
      • Variance: 2,042 FBS finals from 2024-26 have margin SD 15.59; sqrt-possession scaling gives first-half SD 11.02, not 7.79.
      • At the exact 6.5 rung, mean 5.5 and SD 11.02 produce Duke-over probability 46.4%, so NO is 53.6% versus a 49¢ buy price.
      • Only two 2026 games per team; raw points/drive is highly schedule-sensitive and not fully opponent-adjusted.
    2. 1H total under 26.5
      +96%Won

      Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

      Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Bottom-up projection is roughly 22-24 first-half points from recent PPD and pace, below 26.5.
      • Recent PPD averages 2.38 for Duke and 1.35 for Stanford; opponent EPA supports Duke efficiency but weak Stanford scoring.
      • Duke averaged 29.6 seconds per play and Stanford 24.1; roughly six drives each limits the projected half.
      • Only two games per team and no first-half splits; projection error can exceed one touchdown.
    3. Duke Blue Devils wins 1st HalfFavorite
      +49%Won

      Taken at 67¢ on Kalshi

      Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Model: Duke 1H win 72%; devigged Kalshi three-way substitute reference is 68%.
      • Recent points per drive average 2.38 for Duke versus 1.35 for Stanford across two 2026 games.
      • Recent EPA/play averages: Duke offense +0.13; Stanford offense -0.02; Duke defense allowed -0.07.
      • Only two 2026 games per team; opponent adjustment and first-half splits are thin.
    4. Game 1H total under 26.5
      +100%Won

      Taken at 50¢ on Kalshi

      Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • 2026 season-to-date, Stanford averaged 24.06 seconds/play and 79.5 plays/game; Duke averaged 29.66 seconds/play and 71.0 plays/game.
      • Observed first-half usage averaged 7.0 Stanford drives/38 plays and 4.5 Duke drives/35 plays: 11.5 projected drives.
      • Specific PROE uplift: average PROE was +0.08, producing an 8.0% scripted-start adjustment and a 21.75-point projection.
      • The warehouse weather fields were null; external forecasts ranged from 20% to 65% shower chance, so the possession cut is unresolved.
    5. Game total under 52
      +89%Won

      Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX

      Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • current 2026 pace is 29.59 sec/play Duke and 24.07 Stanford; Duke PROE -0.02, Stanford +0.18, with only 0.12/0.12 explosive rates.
      • Stanford's .4568 offensive success rate meets Duke's -0.07 defensive EPA allowed; Duke's .4379 success rate meets Stanford's +.446 allowed, creating a strong Duke-side scoring path but not a balanced shootout.
      • 2025 fallback sample (14 Duke, 12 Stanford games) was flagged: Duke averaged 22.27 sec/play and .145 explosive rate; Stanford .097 explosive rate, with both defenses near +.14 EPA allowed.
      • Current 2026 sample is only two games per team, below the three-game target; prior-season fallback forces this to LEAN sizing.

    Questions

    Who won Stanford vs. Duke?

    Duke won 35-7 on Saturday, Sep 19, 2026.