FinalFortera Stadium
UT Martin1-3
12–35Final
Austin Peay3-1
Score by period
Team1234T
UT930012
AUST7021735

Top model pick, graded

Won

Game total under 51.5 46¢

CFB HeaterUp 8% return this season · 367 picks

How the picks did

Models went 6-1 on this game · +76% return

  1. Game total under 51.52 models agree
    +117%Won

    Taken at 46¢ on Polymarket

    2 modelsCFB Heater, Long Way Home
    Why 2 models like it
    CFB Heater
      • The market is modestly liquid rather than deep; the quoted 46¢ can move sharply near kickoff.
      Long Way Home
      • Austin Peay managed 9 points and 178 total yards in its only current-season game; its offense posted 0.10 EPA/play and 1.0 points/drive.
      • UT Martin scored 28 points across two current-season FBS games (14.0 per game), with only 0.07, 0.12 explosive rate in those games.
      • Most likely loss: UT Martin's defense allowed 0.42 and 0.66 EPA/play in its two games, giving Austin Peay a path to an efficient scoring day.
    • Game total under 52.5 points
      +87%Won

      Taken at −115 on FanDuel

      Kickoff LedgerDown 24% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • UT Martin: -0.09 offensive EPA/play, 42.4% success, and 9.5% explosive rate over two games.
      • UT Martin scored 7 and 21 against its two FBS opponents; Austin Peay allowed 17.0 points per game across four.
      • Both offenses average roughly 28.5 seconds per play, supporting fewer possessions than a fast-tempo matchup.
      • Austin Peay averaged 36.3 points across four games, creating backdoor and short-field risk.
    • Austin Peay Governors spread −15.5
      +90%Won

      Taken at −111 on DraftKings

      Why it likes it
      • Austin Peay is 3-1 with a +77 point differential; UT Martin is 1-3 with a -46 differential.
      • Austin Peay carries a 91.7 PFF team grade and 83.8 defense grade; UT Martin allowed +0.34 EPA/play in its five-game advanced sample.
      • PWP Composite Grade: 72/100 (B), qualifying positive edge.
      • The projection is a transparent score/EPA estimate; cfb_predictor returned no row for this FCS matchup.
    • Game total over 52 (pushes at exactly 52; historical exact-total mass 2.497%)
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • ProphetX prices over 52 at -121 (54.75¢) versus over 52.5 at -114 (53.27¢), only a 1.48-point gap.
      • The whole-number total preserves a refund at 52, while the observed price difference is smaller than the historical exact-total mass.
    • Austin Peay −17 spread (pushes at exactly 17; historical home-margin mass 2.150%)
      +92%Won

      Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • ProphetX prices Austin Peay -17 at -107 (51.69¢) versus -17.5 at -101 (50.25¢), only a 1.44-point gap.
      • The whole-number contract retains the exact-margin refund option, and the quoted gap is smaller than the measured push mass.
      • A margin other than exactly 17 produces an ordinary spread win or loss; the refund option is narrow.
    • Austin Peay Governors spread −19.5
      +133%Won

      Taken at 43¢ on ProphetX

      Long Way HomeDown 6% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • UT Martin averages -0.09 offensive EPA/play and 0.54 defensive EPA allowed across two 2026 games.
      • Austin Peay’s three wins are by 18, 56, and 22; UT Martin has lost three games by 12, 45, and 24.
      • Pinnacle’s main spread is Austin Peay -17.5 at +101, supporting the home-side direction.
      • The projection rests on very small samples, and opponent quality differs sharply across those games.

    Questions

    Who won UT Martin vs. Austin Peay?

    Austin Peay won 35-12 on Saturday, Sep 26, 2026.