FinalJordan-Hare Stadium
15–21Final
Auburn2-1
Score by period
Team1234T
VAN306615
AUB777021

Top model pick, graded

Won

Vanderbilt Commodores spread +11.5 55¢

Why Saturday Board Pairs likes it: Three-game 2026 sample: Vanderbilt's offense posts +0.10 EPA/play and 51.0% success; Auburn is at +0.15 and 48.0%.

Saturday Board PairsDown 4% this season · 567 picks

How the picks did

Models went 9-8 on this game · +6% return

  1. Game total points over 54.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Key Number CFB
    Why 2 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • Auburn averaged +0.15 EPA/play across 3 current-season games; Vanderbilt's defense allowed +0.10 EPA/play across 3.
    • Vanderbilt averaged +0.10 offensive EPA/play against Auburn's +0.09 defensive EPA/play allowed; both offenses cleared 47% success rate.
    • Auburn's offense can regress after its 0.26 EPA/play Florida game, while Vanderbilt's 28-second pace can suppress possessions.
    Key Number CFB
      • Most likely loss path: Vanderbilt's slower 27.81-second pace and Auburn's defensive efficiency keep the game at 54 points or fewer.
    • Vanderbilt Commodores spread +9.52 models agree
      +113%Won

      Taken at 47¢ on ProphetX

      2 modelsKey Number CFB, Long Way Home
      Why 2 models like it
      Key Number CFB
      • CFB histogram: absolute margin 10 occurred 455 of 10,845 games (4.2%); the ladder charges more than that broad key-number mass for the extra point.
      • Auburn is still the projected winner, but its three margins are +1, +35, -5; Vanderbilt's are +19, +9, +4, keeping the mean near the rung.
      • Auburn's efficiency edge can produce a clean double-digit win, making +9.5 lose even if the side is directionally right.
      Long Way Home
      • Auburn's three-game average margin is +10.3; Vanderbilt's is +10.7, so the matchup does not justify a double-digit home-tax assumption.
      • Vanderbilt's slower 27.8-second pace versus Auburn's 21.6 compresses possessions and helps the underdog stay within the number.
      • Auburn's 14.9% explosive-play rate can create the separation this spread requires.
    • Auburn Tigers spread −9.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 53¢ on Polymarket

      CFB HeaterUp 16% last 7 days
    • Over 54.5 total
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

      Saturday BoardDown 15% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Current PPD: Auburn 2.62, Vanderbilt 2.11; explosive rates 14.9% and 13.3% support the Over.
      • Vanderbilt averaged 27.81 seconds per play; stalled drives could reduce combined possessions.
    • Vanderbilt Commodores to winLong shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 24¢ on ProphetX

      DriftUp 12% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Vanderbilt's current success rate is .5104 versus Auburn's .4804 across three 2026 games.
      • Auburn's current offense leads in EPA/play (.1474 to .1045) and explosive rate (.1488 to .1336), with home field.
    • Vanderbilt Commodores spread +11.5
      +82%Won

      Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

      Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Three-game 2026 sample: Vanderbilt's offense posts +0.10 EPA/play and 51.0% success; Auburn is at +0.15 and 48.0%.
      • The efficiency gap is modest relative to 11.5 points: Auburn's offense is +0.04 EPA/play above Vanderbilt's defensive allowance.
      • Vanderbilt's 0.13 explosive rate is close to Auburn's 0.15, while Auburn's 21.64-second pace and +13.5% PROE create comeback possessions.
      • Auburn's PFF offense grade is 73.9 versus Vanderbilt's 66.0, with a 69.2 pass-block grade versus Vanderbilt's 54.7.
    Show all 15 picks
    1. 1H total under 28.5 points
      +85%Won

      Taken at 54¢ on Kalshi

      Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Auburn's 3-game average: 78.0 plays, 21.6 seconds/play, 2.62 points per drive.
      • Vanderbilt averages 65.3 plays, 27.8 seconds/play, and 2.11 points per drive; slower pace compresses possessions.
      • Bottom-up pace and points-per-drive projection is roughly 26 first-half points, below 28.5.
      • Only three games per team; opponent quality and rounded points-per-drive inputs are noisy.
    2. 1H total over 28.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 46¢ on Kalshi

      Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • full-game 54.5 scaled through the model gives 29.4 first-half points, not a flat 27.25.
      • 71.7 projected first-half plays: (Auburn 78.0 + Vanderbilt 65.33) ÷ 2; approximately 11.0 drives at 6.5 plays per drive.
      • Baseline points per drive is 2.36; average PROE 0.12 and explosive rate 0.14 produce a data-derived 13.1% first-half uplift to 2.67.
      • Drive count is estimated, not observed: 6.5 plays per drive is an approximation after only three games per team.
    3. Vanderbilt Commodores @ Auburn Tigers total under 54
      +108%Won

      Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Under 54 pushes at exactly 54; Under 54.5 wins at 54 and cannot push.
      • ProphetX quotes Under 54 at +107 versus Under 54.5 at +101, giving the whole-number rung a 6-cent payout improvement despite surrendering 54 as a win.
      • Under 54 loses at 55 or more, while Under 54.5 wins at 54; the contracts are not outcome-equivalent.
    4. Vanderbilt Commodores +10 spread
      +100%Won

      Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

      House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Vanderbilt +10 pushes if Auburn wins by exactly 10; Vanderbilt +10.5 has no push.
      • ProphetX quotes Vanderbilt +10 at +101 versus Vanderbilt +10.5 at -113, a 11.4-cent price gap in the wrong direction for the less favorable rung.
      • The CFB 2014, 25 margin distribution may not fit this matchup's scoring environment.
    5. Game total under 53.5
      +113%Won

      Taken at 47¢ on ProphetX

      Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Backing under 53.5, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches; 46.95¢ (+113).
      • Venue self-reference provides no independent ticket or handle confirmation.
    6. Vanderbilt +8.5
      +117%Won

      Taken at 46¢ on ProphetX

      Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Backing Vanderbilt +8.5, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches; 46.30¢ (+116).
      • Venue self-reference provides no independent ticket or handle confirmation.
    7. Vanderbilt to winLong shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 23¢ on ProphetX

      Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Backing Vanderbilt, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches; ProphetX quotes +330 American, 23.26¢.
      • Venue self-reference provides no independent ticket or handle confirmation.
    8. Game total points under 56.5
      +75%Won

      Taken at 57¢ on ProphetX

      Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • ProphetX's 56.5 full-game line sits 1.5 points above its quoted 33.5 Auburn plus 21.5 Vanderbilt team-total rungs.
      • ProphetX's own ladder supports the lower side: 54.5 over is -103, while 55 under is -109 and 56.5 under is -130.
      • 2026 sample covers three games per team: Vanderbilt's pace was 33.80, 25.76, 23.87 seconds/play; Auburn's was 21.70, 23.05, 20.16.
      • Both teams have scored 98 Vanderbilt and 99 Auburn points through three games, so the under depends on avoiding another shootout.
    9. Auburn wins 1H by over 7.5 points
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 58¢ on Kalshi

      Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • 2026 averages: Auburn 2.62 points/drive, 78 plays and 14.9% explosive rate; Vanderbilt 2.11, 65.3 and 13.4%.
      • Projected first-half mean is Auburn +5.5; exact 7.5 rung is below 60% Auburn-over after conservative college 7-point mass adjustment.
      • Only three 2026 games per team; first-half splits and matchup-specific defensive estimates are thin.

    Questions

    Who won Vanderbilt vs. Auburn?

    Auburn won 21-15 on Saturday, Sep 26, 2026.