FinalProtective Stadium
Navy1-1
20–24Final
UAB1-2
Score by period
Team1234T
NAVY0137020
UAB0170724

Top model pick, graded

Won

UAB Blazers spread +3.5 42¢

Why Resting Money likes it: Book levels are UAB 3 versus Navy 3: thin-at-quote plus deeper total depth clears the two-of-three consistency standard.

Resting MoneyDown 3% this season · 1232 picks

How the picks did

Models went 4-6 on this game · −3% return

  1. UAB Blazers spread +6.52 models agree
    +100%Won

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsLong Way Home, ProphetX Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    Long Way Home
    • 2026 form points to Navy by roughly 4, below the 6.5-point main spread.
    • Navy offense is +0.22 EPA/play; UAB offense is -0.11, but UAB home field narrows the gap.
    • Most likely loss: Navy's explosive offense creates early separation and UAB cannot answer.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • Action Network's Sep. 23 preview reports Navy starter Braxton Woodson out; Jackson Gutierrez is expected to take over.
    • UAB's defense has allowed 0.10 EPA/play versus Navy's 0.16 through current-season games.
    • Early-season sample is thin: Navy has two games and UAB three.
  2. Navy Midshipmen spread −12.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 33¢ on ProphetX

    CFB Moonshot SinglesUp 44% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 39.0% independent fair probability from Navy's 8.64-point projected margin plus its stronger recent EPA profile.
    • Navy has 0.15 recent offensive EPA/play and 0.50 success rate versus UAB's -0.00 EPA/play and 0.48 success rate.
    • Navy must win by 13 or more, materially beyond the current market spread near -6.5.
  3. Game total over 51.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −105 on FanDuel

    Why it likes it
    • 55.6-point offense/defense blend projection is 7.9% above the 51.5 line.
    • Combined last-10 total-over rate is 60% (12 of 20); UAB has cleared this number in 7 of 10.
    • Navy's expected quarterback replacement, Jackson Gutierrez, produced 100 passing yards, 75 rushing yards and 2 total TDs last game.
    • Navy's last-five over rate is only 40%, so the recent signal is team-dependent rather than uniform.
  4. Game 1H total under 23.5Favorite
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 74¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Q1 ended 0-0 after five drives; the season drive sample projects roughly 5.1 combined drives remaining in Q2.
    • Navy averages 3.50 points/drive and UAB 2.12; a 2.65/2.43 Navy-UAB Q2 drive split gives 14.4 points before adjustment.
    • First-half adjustment is only +0.5 points: mean PROE is -4.9% and explosive rate 11.8%, not a hot-script profile.
    • A short-field turnover or busted coverage can create 14+ second-quarter points; the 0-0 live sample is thin.
  5. Navy Midshipmen spread −7
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 47¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Navy -7 pushes on an exact 7-point win; Navy -7.5 loses on that same margin.
    • ProphetX quotes Navy -7 at +113 versus Navy -7.5 at +128: only 15 American points separate the rungs.
    • point Navy win refunds rather than wins; the adjacent -7.5 contract would cash there.
  6. UAB Blazers spread +3.5
    +138%Won

    Taken at 42¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Book levels are UAB 3 versus Navy 3: thin-at-quote plus deeper total depth clears the two-of-three consistency standard.
    • Backing UAB +3.5, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • A single late book cancellation or reprice can erase this two-measure venue-self-reference signal.
Show all 9 picks
  1. UAB Blazers to win
    +233%Won

    Taken at 30¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Book levels are UAB 3 versus Navy 3: the thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it pattern qualifies on two of three measures.
    • Backing UAB, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • Depth stake is queued at worse prices and is not all executable at the +230 quote.
  2. Navy Midshipmen to winFavorite
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 70¢ on ProphetX

    Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Navy averages +0.22 offensive EPA/play versus UAB allowing +0.09; a +0.14 EPA/play mismatch.
    • Navy's .490 success rate and .135 explosive rate exceed UAB's .476 and .101 current-season marks.
    • Navy's prior-season 13-game blend was +0.13 EPA/play and .516 success rate; the two-game current sample makes this a flagged LEAN.
    • Most likely loss: Navy's defense allowed +0.16 EPA/play in its two 2026 games, giving UAB a live shootout path.
  3. Game total over 50
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    Long Way HomeDown 6% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • five 2026 game totals average 54.2 points, above ProphetX's 50-point rung.
    • Both defenses allowed positive EPA/play in four of five sampled games, pointing to scoring leakage.
    • Combined pace averaged about 27.8 seconds per play across the teams' sampled games.
    • Most likely loss: UAB repeats its 14-point, 218-yard performance and the game finishes at 50 or fewer.

Questions

Who won Navy vs. UAB?

UAB won 24-20 on Friday, Sep 25, 2026.