FinalAtlanta Stadium · Atlanta
3–1Final
Atlanta United
Score by period
Team12T
CINC033
AU011

How the picks did

Models went 0-11 on this game · −100% return

  1. Match total under 3.5 goals2 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 53¢ on Kalshi

    2 modelsEarly Whistle, Snapp Decision of the Day
    Why 2 models like it
    Early Whistle
    • Opponent-adjusted scoring/conceding blend gives Atlanta 1.33 and Cincinnati 1.55 goals, total rate 2.88.
    • That blend implies 67.3% for 0-3 goals; the warehouse Dixon-Coles pair (1.22, 1.78) still implies about 64.8%.
    • The blended rates are only supported by nine xG matches per side, so estimation error remains material.
    Snapp Decision of the Day
    • 2.88 combined model xG implies about 67.4% for 0-3 goals under a Poisson total.
    • The Polymarket US Under contract costs 52¢; including its quoted fee schedule, effective cost is about 53.7¢.
    • Atlanta conceded 18 goals in 10 home matches, and Cincinnati conceded 14 in 10 away matches.
  2. Total goals under 2.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 31¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsTeam Sheet Pairs, Long Haul
    Why 2 models like it
    Team Sheet Pairs
    • Confirmed XI attacking xG totals 2.35: Atlanta United 1.16 plus Cincinnati 1.20, versus the warehouse pregame total of 2.88, a -0.52 delta.
    • Both teams' confirmed starters cleared the lineup gate; XI-quality baselines have 10 known samples for Cincinnati and Atlanta.
    • Three or more goals loses; an early goal, penalty, or red card can open the match.
    Long Haul
    • The model-to-contract gap is 14.38 percentage points; this is a model lean, not a devig or payout-only argument.
    • related over 2.5 is -245; under is the contrarian regular-time total selection.
    • No usable Long Haul pillar: rest readings are 357/321 days and fail the >10-day sanity check; travel is unrecorded.
  3. under 2.5 Total Goals2 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 31¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsTwo Nil Pairs, Long Tail Pairs
    Why 2 models like it
    Two Nil Pairs
      • Features were computed through 2025-12-13; current-season transfers and tactics may have made the fitted lambdas stale.
      Long Tail Pairs
      • Tata Martino said Atlanta must avoid a blow-for-blow game and stop Cincinnati dictating tempo; his stated transition-control plan points to a managed pace.
      • Confirmed XI: Cincinnati is without Evander, and the posted XI is in the lineup feed; that removes a primary attacking creator from the direct-transition matchup.
      • Most likely loss: Cincinnati's direct 1.94 style creates transition chances and the match reaches three goals.
    • Total goals under 3.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

      Two NilUp 11% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Averaging opponent-adjusted attack and defense pairs gives 2.64 expected goals versus a market-implied total near 3.5.
      • Only 10 xG-backed matches per side, below the 12-game preferred tier; rolling rates may be noisy.
    • Over 1.5 1H goals scoredLong shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 17¢ on Kalshi

      Half LightDown 15% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Full-match ladder fits a Poisson mean of 2.62 goals; MLS recent first-half share measured 40.3%.
      • That split reconciles to a 1H mean of 1.06, versus 0.76 from the quoted 1H ladder: 0.30 goals of incoherence.
      • The match is live at 25' with a 0-0 score; the remaining first-half window is shorter than pregame.
    • Game total under 3.5 goals
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 52¢ on Kalshi

      Low Tide LineUp 13% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Projection: 67.5% for three or fewer goals from Dixon-Coles lambdas 1.63 home and 1.25 away.
      • Expected goals total 2.88; both teams have 10 competitive matches in the feature sample.
      • Pinnacle's devigged total points under, about 51.5% versus 48.5% over.
      • The projection-versus-price gap is unusually large; model miss or an unrecorded lineup change could explain it.
    Show all 8 picks
    1. Both Teams To Score NO
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 30¢ on Kalshi

      Both NetsDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • current kickoff xG read gives Atlanta scoring 78.8% and Cincinnati 73.6%; implied BTTS YES 58.1%, NO 41.9%.
      • Symmetric case: both sides score often, but the combined independent read still makes BTTS-NO materially more likely than the venue implies.
      • Pinnacle and Kalshi both price BTTS-NO near 30%, so unmodeled lineup or market information may invalidate the xG projection.
    2. Atlanta United spread YES 1.5Long shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 23¢ on Kalshi

      HandicapDown 13% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Atlanta xG inputs are 1.36 attack and Cincinnati 1.61 defensive xGA; mirror inputs are Cincinnati 1.32 and Atlanta 1.28, with model lambdas 1.63 and 1.25.
      • Recent 120 MLS finals: 37 draws, 21 one-goal home wins, 16 two-goal home wins, and 10 home wins by 3+; this supports a lumpy but modest projection.
      • The 120-match distribution is league-wide rather than team-specific, and only 10 xG matches support the matchup lambdas.

    Questions

    Who won Cincinnati vs. Atlanta United?

    Cincinnati won 3-1 on Saturday, Oct 10, 2026.