FinalAllegacy Federal Credit Union Stadium
Miami2-0
33–20Final
Score by period
Team1234T
MIA7177233
WAKE706720

Top model pick, graded

Won

Wake Forest Demon Deacons +20.5 52¢

Why CFB Heater likes it: SDTrading is 17-0 in its tracked CFB sample; 0xd4cfe5 is 26-0; 0x840b03 is 19-2.

CFB HeaterUp 8% return this season · 367 picks

How the picks did

Models went 6-7 on this game · −18% return

  1. Miami Hurricanes spread −20.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsKey Number CFB, Rnj
    Why 2 models like it
    Key Number CFB
    • Miami's 2026 efficiency: +0.78 offensive EPA/play and -0.18 defensive EPA/play; Wake: +0.34 and +0.14.
    • Most likely loss: Wake sustains enough drives to keep Miami at 20 points or fewer.
    Rnj
    • Season-to-date matchup EPA differential is +0.14 per play for Miami, using the two-game fallback window.
    • Miami's offense averages 0.79 EPA/play; Wake Forest allows 0.14 EPA/play. Its defense allows -0.17.
    • The one-point spread range meets the minimum gate but misses the 1.5-point high-conviction threshold.
  2. Miami Hurricanes spread −202 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, Long Way Home
    Why 2 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • 2026 sample (2 games): Miami is +0.78 EPA/play and 63.0% success; Wake is +0.34 and 52.1%.
    • Miami's defensive EPA/play allowed is -0.18 versus Wake's +0.14; the matchup favors sustained Miami separation.
    • Most likely loss: Wake's Gio Lopez sustains enough efficient drives for a backdoor cover inside 20.
    Long Way Home
    • Miami's 2026 team-game profile leads Wake 0.79 to 0.34 in offensive EPA/play and 63.0% to 52.1% in success rate.
    • Miami also leads explosive-play rate 22.6% to 14.9% and points per drive 4.61 to 3.74 across two games.
    • Only two games of data; Miami's 70-point Florida A&M result can materially inflate its efficiency profile.
  3. Wake Forest Demon Deacons +20.5
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on Polymarket

    CFB HeaterUp 16% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • SDTrading is 17-0 in its tracked CFB sample; 0xd4cfe5 is 26-0; 0x840b03 is 19-2.
    • Miami has materially stronger recent EPA form; a favorite covering 20.5 makes this a wide-tail outcome.
  4. Miami Hurricanes win 1H by over 6.5 points
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 31¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Pinnacle Miami -20.0 full-game, scaled to a +10.0 first-half mean.
    • 2024-25 regular FBS signed-margin SD was 22.28 across 1,761 games; half SD is 15.75.
    • 17,225 contracts traded and the 1¢ YES width clears the 4¢ recommended gate.
    • Only two 2026 games per team: EPA, explosive-rate, pace, and points-per-drive samples are thin.
  5. Gio Lopez anytime touchdownLong shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at +250 on BetMGM

    CFB Moonshot SinglesUp 44% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 20 rushing attempts and 98 yards through two games, including two rushing touchdowns.
    • Gio Lopez is the verified probable Wake Forest quarterback; the prop board prices him for this matchup.
    • Wake averages 3.40 points per drive over the recent five-game window.
    • Miami has allowed only 13 points across its first two games and owns superior recent defensive EPA.
  6. Miami Hurricanes 1st-half winnerFavorite
    +22%Won

    Taken at 82¢ on Kalshi

    Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Two-game 2026 averages: Miami posted 0.78 offensive EPA/play and 63.0% success versus Wake's 0.34 and 52.1%.
    • Script matchup favors Miami: Miami offense 0.78 EPA/play against Wake's +0.14 defensive EPA allowed; Wake offense faces Miami's -0.18 allowed rate.
    • Miami's explosive rate is .226 versus Wake's .149, while Miami's PROE averages .092 versus .075 for Wake.
    • Coverage is thin: only two 2026 games per team, with no opponent-quality adjustment.
Show all 11 picks
  1. 1H total over 28.5
    +96%Won

    Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

    Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Conservative script projection is 30, 32 first-half points after down-weighting the two-game mismatch sample.
    • Miami averaged 73 offensive plays with 27.86, 28.86 seconds per play; Wake averaged 66.5 plays at 25.49, 28.62.
    • Miami’s recent offensive success rate was 57.5% and 68.5%; Wake’s was 49.3% and 54.8%.
    • Only two 2026 games per team; Miami’s 77-point FAMU game and Wake’s 38, 36 Purdue game inflate early efficiency.
  2. Miami Hurricanes −20.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
  3. Mark Fletcher Jr. over 78.5 rushing yards
    +88%Won

    Taken at −114 on FanDuel

    Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model estimate 62%; FanDuel -114 implies 53.3%, an 8.7-point value margin.
    • Fletcher cleared 78.5 rushing yards in 7 of his last 10 appearances.
    • FanDuel offers the best verified price found for this prop at -114.
    • Wake Forest allowed only 137.5 rushing yards per game in 2026, below the 178.1 top-35 favorable-over cutoff.
  4. 1H total over 27.5
    +75%Won

    Taken at 57¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Miami averaged 73 plays at 28.36 seconds/play; Wake averaged 66.5 at 27.05, blending to 27.71 seconds/play.
    • Miami first-half PPD was 5.40 (28/6 and 49/8); Wake was 5.17 (28/6 and 17/3), above baselines of 4.61 and 3.74.
    • Only two 2026 games per team; prior opponents were weaker than this ACC matchup, so uplift may be overstated.
  5. Wake Forest Demon Deacons spread +20.5
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • ProphetX’s current Wake +20.5 quote is 51.92¢ (-108); Wake +20 last showed 50.50¢ (-102).
    • The remaining 0.28-point gap is small and may reflect unmodeled market information.

Questions

Who won Miami vs. Wake Forest?

Miami won 33-20 on Friday, Sep 18, 2026.