FinalLower.com Field
2–4Final
Score by period
Team12T
TORO022
COLU224

How the picks did

Models went 0-16 on this game · −100% return

  1. Toronto to winLong shot2 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 20¢ on Polymarket US

    2 modelsSnapp Decision of the Day, Deep Book
    Why 2 models like it
    Snapp Decision of the Day
    • Warehouse model makes Toronto a 35.2% away-win chance versus roughly 20.7% market probability.
    • Opponent-adjusted xG favors Toronto attack, 1.11 to Columbus 0.92 per match.
    • Columbus is 5-5 at home and remains the clear favorite in sportsbook pricing.
    Deep Book
      • Most likely loss: Columbus wins; a draw pushes this 2-way contract.
    • Both Teams To Score NO2 models agree
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 37¢ on Kalshi

      2 modelsBoth Nets, Number Earned
      Why 2 models like it
      Both Nets
      • Columbus oppadj xGF is 0.92 over 10 xG matches versus Toronto's 1.51 xGA; home scoring read ≈60.2%.
      • Toronto oppadj xGF is 1.11 over 10 matches versus Columbus's 1.27 xGA; away scoring read ≈66.9%.
      • Expected lineups were last refreshed October 22, not confirmed; Toronto and Columbus both have substantial personnel turnover listed.
      Number Earned
      • Model BTTS-No probability is 62.7% (raw fair price about -168); haircut to 60.5% for uncertainty.
      • DraftKings No +160, Pinnacle +164, and FanDuel +166 all imply a materially lower No probability than the model.
      • Features are computed through October 18 and rely on only 10 recent matches per team.
    • Under 2.5 Total GoalsHigh conviction
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 35¢ on ProphetX

      Two Nil PairsUp 5% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Dixon-Coles/Poisson P(under 2.5) is approximately 71.5% versus ProphetX 34.97¢ implied; the projection gap is about 36.5 points.
      • The ticket loses at 3+ goals; the fitted distribution leaves approximately 28.5% in that tail.
    • Match under 2.5 total goals
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 35¢ on Kalshi

      Early WhistleDown 8% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Opponent-adjusted rates give Columbus 1.11 and Toronto 1.14 expected goals; combined rate 2.26.
      • Poisson translation of the adjusted rates is about 61% under 2.5, versus a 35¢ Kalshi NO price.
      • Pinnacle’s sharp anchor is 3.25 goals, with the under at -112; the Kalshi 2.5 rung is materially cheaper than that total environment.
      • Expected lineups are not official, and a late attacking or goalkeeper change could raise the total.
    • Columbus over 1.5 goals
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 37¢ on Kalshi

      Team SheetDown 7% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • 0.49 xG/90: Wessam Abou Ali is sidelined; the confirmed Columbus XI omits him at 11:40 PDT.
      • λ_home 0.89 before; subtracting Abou Ali's xG/90 gives 0.40 after.
      • Kalshi YES is 63, 65¢, so NO costs 37¢; last contract change was 11:38 PDT, before lineup news at 11:40.
      • The 0.49 xG/90 subtraction may overstate causal loss; replacement and team effects are unmodeled.
    • Under 3.5 total goals
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 57¢ on Polymarket US

      Soccer Default PicksUp 23% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Combined xG-for rates are only 2.28 per match: Columbus 1.07, Toronto 1.21.
      • Confirmed 11:40am lineups remove the main rotation uncertainty before kickoff.
      • Polymarket US quotes the NO side of the over-3.5 contract at 57¢, well below the estimated win chance.
      • The model has only 10 matches of form coverage for each team.
    Show all 14 picks
    1. Draw (Tie)Long shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 22¢ on Kalshi

      StalemateUp 10% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • MLS draw share is 26.4% (119/451); venue-matched xG is 2.28 (1.07 + 1.21), with a 0.14 side gap.
      • Control is balanced: PPDA gap is 1.85 and field-tilt gap is 5.9 percentage points, both inside draw-shape limits.
      • Own probabilities are Columbus 56.5% / Tie 24.5% / Toronto 19.0%; Pinnacle devigged three-way is 58.0% / 21.5% / 20.5%.
      • Most likely loss: Columbus converts its home advantage before Toronto can keep the match level.
    2. Game total under 3.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 58¢ on ProphetX

      Low Tide LineUp 13% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Model lambdas are 0.89 home plus 0.97 away (1.86 total), approximately 88% under 3.5.
      • Dixon-Coles model puts under 2.5 at 71.5%, leaving substantial cushion at the 3.5 line.
      • Pinnacle's 3.25 total has the under at -110, agreeing directionally; recent total movement is essentially flat, not against the under.
      • The projection-to-venue gap is unusually large; model miss, roster news, or market information could explain part of it.
    3. Total under 1.5 first half goals
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 57¢ on Polymarket US

      Coaches CornerDown 8% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Rydström's official 2026 identity stresses possession, offensive/defensive pressing, and close attacking distances.
      • Columbus averages 50.9% possession and 86.4% passing; Toronto averages 40.3% and 79.8%.
      • Toronto's 0.96 directness ratio versus Columbus' 0.68 points to a transition-oriented away approach rather than sustained early control.
      • Rydström also wants more directness, so an aggressive home start can create an early goal.
    4. Match total under 3.5 goals
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 58¢ on Polymarket US

      Snapp Decision of the DayDown 8% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Warehouse model gives under 2.5 goals a 71.5% probability, strongly supporting under 3.5.
      • Model expected-goal lambdas are only 0.89 for Columbus and 0.97 for Toronto.
      • The model’s 2.03 opponent-adjusted combined xG is well below the 3.5-goal threshold.
      • Toronto and Columbus average 13.0 and 14.3 shots per match across the recent window.
    5. Toronto FC moneyline +260Long shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 28¢ on ProphetX

      Fair Price PairsDown 20% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • The model uses raw Toronto away-win probability because a draw also loses this 2-way contract; no draw renormalization.
      • Most likely loss: the match draws or Columbus Crew wins; both outcomes defeat the 2-way Toronto contract.
    6. Toronto moneyline +260Long shot
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 28¢ on ProphetX

      Long Tail PairsDown 22% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • Interim coach Laurent Courtois says Columbus’ recent on- and off-ball chance creation is continuous; that proactive scheme can leave transition space.
      • Matchup read: Toronto’s directness ratio is 0.96 versus Columbus’s 0.68, supporting an away transition path against Columbus’s proactive approach.
      • No official XI is posted; both lineups remain expected from October 22, with six Toronto and two Columbus players listed out.
    7. Total goals under 2.5
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 35¢ on ProphetX

      Long HaulDown 21% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • This is the wake's single permitted off-thesis leg, published at half size; no parlay tax is taken.
      • Both XIs remain expected rather than confirmed; Toronto has six and Columbus two listed sidelined players, so the 10/18 feature snapshot may miss late changes.
    8. Columbus Crew spread NO above 1.5 goalsFavorite
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 66¢ on Kalshi

      HandicapDown 13% last 7 days
      Why it likes it
      • PROJECTION; qualified xG sample: 10 games each; Columbus λ 0.89, Toronto λ 0.97.
      • MLS 2026 empirical base: 106 of 451 home teams won by 2+ goals (23.5%); this matchup's inputs are less Columbus-favorable.
      • NO REFERENCE; the captured sportsbook spread is -1.0, not a valid same-rung comparison to -1.5.
      • No independent same-rung sharp handicap price exists; Kalshi may reflect information missing from the warehouse.

    Questions

    Who won Toronto vs. Columbus Crew?

    Columbus Crew won 4-2 on Saturday, Oct 24, 2026.