| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| CINC | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| IM | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Top model pick, graded
WonCincinnati Spread (Regular Time) +1 48¢
Why ProphetX Touchline likes it: Pillar 1/3 mismatch: Noonan's direct pressure-breaking route produced a 2-0 clean sheet last match; Cincinnati's 56.2% field tilt versus Miami's 45.4% supports margin control against Miami's newer 4-3-3/4-4-2 setup.
How the picks did
Models went 8-3 on this game · +40% return
- Cincinnati Spread (Regular Time) +1+108%Won
Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX
ProphetX TouchlineUp 9% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Pillar 1/3 mismatch: Noonan's direct pressure-breaking route produced a 2-0 clean sheet last match; Cincinnati's 56.2% field tilt versus Miami's 45.4% supports margin control against Miami's newer 4-3-3/4-4-2 setup.
- Cincinnati broke D.C. pressure with a long-ball transition in the October 24 recap; Miami just lost 2-0 at New York Red Bulls, a recent control warning for Kily González's side.
- Most likely loss: Miami's stronger press, 11.36 PPDA versus Cincinnati's 14.96, wins the buildup battle and produces a two-goal home victory; exactly one goal down is a push.
- 1H goals under 1.5+122%Won
Taken at 45¢ on Kalshi
Half LightDown 15% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- The clean 1H ladder fits a Poisson mean of 1.85, overstating its reconciled mean by 0.25 goals.
- At 1.5, the 1H ladder implies 55.5% over; reconciled probability is 47.3%, so under is 52.7%.
- The 40.7% split uses 182 goals across 60 recent MLS fixtures; sampling noise remains.
- Both teams to score+54%Won
Taken at 65¢ on Kalshi
ParallaxDown 60% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- The Kalshi history was about 72c around 4:00pm and is now 66c, an 8.3% relative move that remains below the 15% decay threshold and is moving away from the sharp reference.
- The live warehouse state is 0-0 at 15' with both XIs confirmed; roughly 75 minutes remain for either side to score.
- 0 live state is the central failure path: one team can remain scoreless for the rest of the match.
- Cincinnati to win−100%Lost
Taken at 19¢ on Kalshi
Low Tide LineUp 13% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Cincinnati's rolling xG is 1.89 versus Miami's 1.59; Dixon-Coles lambdas favor Cincinnati 2.03 to 1.61.
- Kalshi actively quotes both sides: Cincinnati 18/19¢ and Miami 62/63¢, a one-cent spread.
- Pinnacle moved Miami from -196 to -175, a drift against the home favorite and toward Cincinnati.
- Neither XI is official; Cincinnati lists José Martínez out, while Miami has three listed absences and no confirmed lineup.
- Inter Miami spread NO 1.5+69%Won
Taken at 59¢ on Kalshi
HandicapDown 13% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Projection: Dixon-Coles lambdas are Miami 1.61 and Cincinnati 2.03; Miami winning by 2+ is about 14.8%, so NO is about 85.2%.
- No official XIs yet; late lineup or availability news could materially change the goal distribution.
- Match under 3.5 total goals−100%Lost
Taken at 41¢ on Kalshi
Two NilUp 11% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Opp-adjusted xG gives Inter Miami 1.48 and Cincinnati 1.68; projected total 3.16 goals.
- The Kalshi ladder implies roughly 4.1 goals; projection-versus-market is a PROJECTION edge, but only a LEAN.
- REFERENCE only: fresh Pinnacle is 4.0, an off-line rung, so it is not an independent same-rung check.
Show all 11 picks
- BTTS NO−100%Lost
Taken at 28¢ on Kalshi
Both NetsDown 7% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Ten-match xG coverage each: Inter Miami scoring read ≈78.5% from 1.50 opp-adjusted xGF versus Cincinnati's 1.57 xGA.
- Ten-match xG coverage each: Cincinnati scoring read ≈82.4% from 1.78 opp-adjusted xGF versus Inter Miami's 1.70 xGA.
- Independent per-side estimate gives BTTS YES ≈64.7%, so BTTS NO ≈35.3% versus a 28% NO price; projection edge is about 7.3 points.
- Both attacks and defenses support goals; one goal by each side loses the NO contract.
- Cincinnati spread +1+108%Won
Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX
Long Tail PairsDown 22% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- FC Cincinnati's official preview quotes Pat Noonan emphasizing “fresh legs” through matches every two or three days.
- Cincinnati carries the warehouse congestion flag despite four days' rest; Noonan's rotation management is the coaching read.
- Style: Cincinnati field tilt 0.56 and directness 0.69 can keep Miami from creating separation.
- Most likely loss: Inter Miami wins by two or more; its home Elo advantage is 125.6 points.
- Match total under 4.5+64%Won
Taken at 61¢ on ProphetX
Long HaulDown 21% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- no Long Haul decay pillar cleared; warehouse lambdas are 1.61 home and 2.03 away, totaling 3.64.
- The independent Poisson total from those lambdas puts under 4.5 near 69.7%; I haircut that to 65% for model and lineup uncertainty.
- Expected lineups are the only current XI information; this is the one permitted off-thesis leg and is capped at LEAN, half size.
- Most likely loss: five or more total goals; the warehouse also projects 70.5% for over 2.5, so the tail is live.
- Cincinnati +1+108%Won
Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX
Long HaulDown 21% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- The model's away-win/draw profile supports Cincinnati avoiding a multi-goal defeat; the +1 spread loses only on an Inter Miami win by 2+.
- captured Pinnacle has Inter Miami -175 three-way; context only, not the placement venue.
- Most likely loss: Inter Miami wins by at least two goals; the large Elo edge is 125.6 points toward Miami.
- FC Cincinnati spread +1+108%Won
Taken at 48¢ on ProphetX
Deep BookUp 4% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- ProphetX board as_of_pt 2026-10-28 1:45:22 PM PDT; +107 is inside the price band and clears the $300 availability gate.
- Most likely loss: Inter Miami wins by more than one goal; the model does not publish an exact +1 cover probability.
Questions
Who won Cincinnati vs. Inter Miami?
Inter Miami won 2-2 on Wednesday, Oct 28, 2026.