Coastal Carolina vs. MarshallFinal score and model picks, graded
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCU | 3 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 27 |
| MRSH | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 |
Top model pick, graded
WonUnder 58.5 total points 53¢
Why Drift likes it: Model 57.0% under: five-game scoring cross-average projects 53.5 points from Marshall 22.2 PF/35.0 PA and Coastal 24.8 PF/25.0 PA.
How the picks did
Models went 14-6 on this game · +38% return
- Coastal Carolina Chanticleers to win+170%Won
Taken at 37¢ on ProphetX


3 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, CFB HunterV2 +1Why 3 models like it
Saturday Board Pairs- Five-game sample: Coastal allows +0.1154 EPA/play versus Marshall’s +0.2254, a 0.1100 defensive-allowance edge.
- Latest boxes led with Deuce Bailey and Carlos Del Rio-Wilson; Marshall’s official preview names both, with no same-day X injury signal.
- Coastal is 1-4 and has allowed at least 31 points in three of its last four games.
CFB HunterV2- 51% model win probability versus 36.5% contract price: +14.5 percentage points.
- Coastal's recent defensive EPA allowed rate (0.1154) is materially better than Marshall's (0.2254).
- Marshall has home field and the commercial spread market implies a sizable home advantage, contrary to the predictor.
Long Way Home- Marshall's five-game defense has allowed +0.2254 EPA/play versus Coastal's +0.1154, a 0.110-point defensive gap the market may underweight.
- Coastal averages 24.8 points per game against Marshall's 22.2, while Marshall allows 35.0 versus Coastal's 25.0.
- Most likely loss: Marshall's home advantage and better +0.0913 offensive EPA/play sustain control despite its defensive leakage.
- Game total under 58.5+89%Won
Taken at −112 on FanDuel


3 modelsPicks With Pink Grading System, CFB HunterV2 +1Why 3 models like it
Picks With Pink Grading System- Our conservative scoring blend projects 55 points, 3.5 below the 58.5 line (about 6% projection separation).
- Under hit in 7 of each team's last 10 games at 58.5; Coastal is 5-for-5 under in its last five.
- Marshall's defense has allowed 0.2001 EPA/play over the recent window, creating a path to an efficient home scoring day.
CFB HunterV2- 61% model under probability versus a 52% takeable price: +9 percentage points.
- The teams' last-five scoring averages combine to 54.0 points, below the 58.5 threshold.
- Marshall's defense has allowed 0.2254 EPA per play recently, creating real over potential.
Long Way Home- Coastal Carolina's five 2026 game totals are 55, 36, 52, 51, and 55; none reached 58.5.
- The five Coastal/Marshall totals average 55.2 points, 3.3 below this threshold.
- Marshall's recent totals include 71 and 62, so its offense can produce a fast over by itself.
- Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread +4.5+96%Won
Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX
2 modelsProphetX CFB Lines, D1 WinnerWhy 2 models like it
ProphetX CFB Lines- Efficiency convergence favors the dog: Coastal's five-game offense averages +0.0589 EPA/play against Marshall's +0.2254 defensive EPA allowed, while Coastal's .1355 explosive rate exceeds Marshall's .0992.
- The +4.5 rung sits above key 3; a conservative home-field-adjusted margin mean of Marshall +2.5 leaves Coastal covering 54.7% of the distribution.
- Most likely loss: Marshall's home edge and stronger .4823 current success rate produce a win by five or more.
D1 Winner- Coastal allows 0.115 EPA/play versus Marshall's 0.225 through five 2026 games.
- Deuce Bailey is officially expected to start; 1,267 yards, 12 TD, and 2 INT this season.
- Marshall has home field and the market moved from roughly -4 to -4.5 against Coastal.
- Under 58.5 total points+89%Won
Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX
DriftUp 11% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Model 57.0% under: five-game scoring cross-average projects 53.5 points from Marshall 22.2 PF/35.0 PA and Coastal 24.8 PF/25.0 PA.
- Marshall's current-season offense is 0.091 EPA/play with a .482 success rate; Coastal is 0.060 EPA/play and .441 success, while both teams' recent scoring profiles stay below 58.5.
- Most likely loss: Marshall and Coastal both outperform their five-game scoring baselines, pushing the game above 58.5.
- Marshall Thundering Herd −9.5−100%Lost
Taken at 37¢ on Novig
Rung ReaderUp 52% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Pinnacle main spread de-vigs to 49.0% for Marshall -4.5; shifting across the 7 key subtracts about 5 points.
- Official previews identify Marshall QB Carlos Del Rio-Wilson and Coastal QB Deuce Bailey; Pinnacle and Novig both show the game line.
- The 44.0% rung estimate is structural, not a directly published Pinnacle -9.5 fair quote.
- Coastal Carolina Chanticleers wins 1st Half+20%Won
Taken at 83¢ on Kalshi
Front RunnerDown 4% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- live Pinnacle has Marshall -194 / Coastal +169 full-game; I applied a conservative first-half state adjustment with an 8.0-point raised bar.
- Live state is Coastal 9-0 at 12:31 Q2; current passing rows show Bailey 5/10 with 1 TD/1 INT and Del Rio-Wilson 2/6 with 3 INT.
- Season-to-date halftime margins were Coastal -0.8 and Marshall -6.8; the current lead and turnover state dominate the pregame baseline.
- DERIVED REFERENCE, not a genuine independent first-half sharp quote; the 8.0-point disagreement bar is intentionally raised.
Show all 15 picks
- Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread +5+85%Won
Taken at 54¢ on ProphetX
Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- PFF supports Coastal's structural edge: 77.4 overall and 76.2 defense versus Marshall's 70.6 and 62.6.
- The matchup's defensive gap is meaningful: Coastal allows +0.1154 EPA/play, 0.1100 better than Marshall's +0.2254.
- Official team pages and latest passing boxes cross-check Deuce Bailey and Carlos Del Rio-Wilson as the quarterbacks; sportsbook reference is Marshall -4.5.
- Coastal is 1-4 and has allowed 31-plus points in three of its last four games.
- 1st-half total under 29.5 points+96%Won
Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi
Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Model projection is roughly 22, 25 first-half points from recent pace and points-per-drive inputs.
- Coastal averaged 1.91 points per drive and .441 success rate over its last five; Marshall averaged 1.71 and .483.
- Combined recent scoring averaged 47.0 full-game points, while both teams’ explosive rates stayed modest: .136 Coastal, .100 Marshall.
- The warehouse lacks first-half-specific drive and scoring splits, so the projection extrapolates full-game PPD into the opening script.
- Coastal Carolina Chanticleers +4.5+96%Won
Taken at 51¢ on Polymarket US
CFB HunterV2Up 0% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- 62% model cover probability versus a 51% takeable price: +11 percentage points.
- The CFB predictor projects essentially no margin gap (Marshall -0.202 points), while Coastal owns the stronger 2026 team and defensive grades.
- Coastal's 0.4378 recent offensive success rate is paired with Marshall's 0.2254 defensive EPA allowed rate.
- Marshall's home environment and faster recent pace can create a multi-score swing.
- Marshall Thundering Herd spread −9.5−100%Lost
Taken at 37¢ on ProphetX
Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- QB gate cleared: latest passing boxes led with Carlos Del Rio-Wilson (37 attempts) and Deuce Bailey (33); official Oct. 8/9 previews identify both quarterbacks.
- Most likely loss: Marshall wins by nine or fewer, or Coastal Carolina wins outright.
- Total Points over 58.5−100%Lost
Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX
Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- ProphetX team-total anchors are Marshall 31.5 and Coastal Carolina 27.5; their 59-point sum supports the full-game over.
- Defensive EPA allowed is positive for both teams: Coastal Carolina +0.1154 and Marshall +0.2254 per play across five games.
- QB gate cleared live: official Marshall preview names Carlos Del Rio-Wilson; the latest passing rows also identify him and Deuce Bailey as the respective leaders.
- Most likely loss: Coastal Carolina stalls below its 27.5 team-total anchor and the combined score finishes 58 or lower.
- Marshall Thundering Herd first-half spread NO 17.5+9%Won
Taken at 92¢ on Kalshi
Early CoverUp 1% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Pinnacle's live full-game spread is Marshall -4.5; the scaled first-half center is approximately Marshall -2.5.
- Own 2024-2026 CFB final-margin sample: 2,611 games, empirical SD 15.68; sqrt-half scaling gives first-half SD 11.09, not 7.84.
- NO REFERENCE at the exact rung: this is model-only after scaling, so the brief caps it at EXPLORATORY; the 92-cent venue self-reference implies only 90% NO at the midpoint.
- Game total over 57.5−100%Lost
Taken at 52¢ on Polymarket US
Heater Two-HourUp 17% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Three recent CFB positions agree on Over 57.5: azntek02, cooljit, and Dredgerton.
- The 2-point probability cushion is small; a near-efficient total can lose on ordinary variance.
- TJ Lester to score a touchdown−100%Lost
Taken at +130 on DraftKings
Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- 3 TD-producing appearances in 5 2026 games: two rushing and one receiving.
- 22 carries across those five games, with a touchdown in 3 of 5 appearances.
- Coastal's recent defense allowed +0.1611 EPA per play over its last 10 games, a favorable environment.
- Five-game current-season sample is the fallback rather than a verified 10-game hit-rate sample.
- Game first-half total over 29.5 points−100%Lost
Taken at 50¢ on Kalshi
Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Weeks 1, 5 drive ledger: Coastal averaged 6.0 and Marshall 6.6 first-half drives; combined 12.6 versus 24.2 full-game drives.
- Weather is a real possession cut: live forecast shows 85% rain, 14-mph wind, and 23-mph gusts; the modeled 8% haircut may be too small.
Questions
Who won Coastal Carolina vs. Marshall?
The Coastal Carolina won 27–21 on Saturday, Oct 10, 2026.