Get app

Texas vs. OklahomaFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalCotton Bowl
Texas4–0
24–27Final
Oklahoma2–2
Score by period
Team1234T
TEX7100724
OU0731727

Top model pick, graded

Won

Texas Longhorns 1st-half winner 64¢

Why Front Runner likes it: Pinnacle full-game Texas -7.5 and 40.5 total, scaled to a first-half margin distribution; no genuine sharp first-half quote exists.

Front RunnerDown 19% this season · 62 picks
Get the next picks first

How the picks did

Models went 4-26 on this game · −71% return

  1. Texas Longhorns spread −7.57 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on Kalshi

    7 modelsSaturday Board, ProphetX CFB Lines +5
    Why 7 models like it
    Saturday Board
      • Most likely loss: Oklahoma keeps the neutral-site rivalry within seven points or wins outright.
      ProphetX CFB Lines
      • Opponent-adjusted efficiency gap is approximately 0.22 EPA/play toward Texas; discounted margin mean is about Texas +10.7, with -7.5 clearing key 7.
      • Most likely loss: Oklahoma's defense holds Texas to a one-score win or the Sooners win outright.
      Kickoff Ledger
      • Texas owns the efficiency edge: +0.214 offensive EPA/play versus Oklahoma at -0.029; defensive EPA allowed is nearly even.
      • Texas leads success rate 52.7% to 46.3% and points per drive 3.13 to 1.81 through four games.
      • The Red River rivalry is a high-variance neutral-site game, and a one-score finish makes the number vulnerable.
      Saturday Board Pairs
      • Texas defense allows -0.1320 EPA/play; Oklahoma’s offense averages -0.0286, while Texas also owns the stronger PFF overall grade, 92.1, 80.5.
      • QB gate cleared: the official OU game primer identifies John Mateer and Arch Manning; latest passing boxes show both led their teams in attempts.
      • Most likely loss: Oklahoma’s -0.1544 defensive EPA allowed keeps Texas out of the end zone and the Sooners stay within seven.
    • Texas Longhorns to winFavorite4 models agree
      −100%Lost

      Taken at 75¢ on Polymarket US

      4 modelsHeater Two-Hour, Picks With Pink Grading System +2
      Why 4 models like it
      Heater Two-Hour
        • Texas can lose outright despite the consensus; Oklahoma home-field and rivalry variance widen the outcome.
        Picks With Pink Grading System
        • Texas is 9-1 straight-up over its last 10; Oklahoma is 6-4.
        • Texas owns +0.1888 offensive EPA/play over the recent 10-game window; Oklahoma is -0.0219.
        • The current-season sample is only four games, and this is a high-variance neutral-site rivalry.
        CFB HunterV2
        • Texas is 4-0 in 2026 while Oklahoma is 2-2, with Texas averaging 33.25 points to Oklahoma's 22.0.
        • Texas leads Oklahoma by 11.6 points in the latest overall team grade and by 31.6 points in passing grade.
        • This neutral-site rivalry has higher variance than the raw 4-0 versus 2-2 records suggest.
        Skip Bayless Tracker
        • @RealSkipBayless feed item at 12:40 PDT: “UNFORTUNATELY: Texas 27, Oklahoma 13.”
        • The exact score is an explicit Texas full-game win call, not a general Longhorns opinion.
        • Oklahoma is the home team and the market still assigns the Sooners roughly a 24.5% chance.
      • Texas Longhorns 1st-half winner2 models agree
        +56%Won

        Taken at 64¢ on Kalshi

        2 modelsFront Runner, Kickoff Script
        Why 2 models like it
        Front Runner
        • Pinnacle full-game Texas -7.5 and 40.5 total, scaled to a first-half margin distribution; no genuine sharp first-half quote exists.
        • Texas season to date: +0.214 offensive EPA/play, 52.2% success rate, and 3.13 points/drive; Oklahoma: -0.029, 45.5%, and 1.81.
        • The derived full-game-to-first-half conversion is an approximation, not an independent first-half sharp reference; model error is the main uncertainty.
        Kickoff Script
        • Texas averages 0.522 offensive success rate versus Oklahoma's 0.455 over four 2026 games.
        • Opponent-adjusted EPA/play gap favors Texas by roughly 0.27: Texas offense versus OU defense, then OU offense versus Texas defense.
        • Only four current-season games supply the coverage tier; opponent adjustment is still noisy.
      • Texas Longhorns spread −12.5High conviction
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 41¢ on Novig

        Rung ReaderUp 52% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • The rung is five points from the 7.5 main line and clears the 3.5-point candidate threshold by 7.15 points.
        • Official Oklahoma Oct. 8 game primer identifies John Mateer versus Arch Manning as the quarterback matchup.
        • Texas can win while failing to clear 12.5; a one-score or 10-point result defeats the ticket.
      • Oklahoma Sooners over 7.5 winning marginLong shot
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 12¢ on Kalshi

        Saturday RungUp 71% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Pinnacle anchors Texas -7.5 at -106/-106; an SD-16 margin tail puts Oklahoma 8+ points ahead near 17%.
        • Reweighting several-season key-number mass around 10 and 14 raises the OU blowout tail modestly, still about 18%.
        • Texas is 4-0 with +0.214 offensive EPA/play; Oklahoma is 2-2 with -0.029 offensive EPA/play.
      • Texas Longhorns −7.5
        −100%Lost

        Taken at −110 on DraftKings

        D1 WinnerUp 5% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Texas current-season offense: +0.212 EPA/play and 52.0% success rate; Oklahoma: -0.028 and 46.3%.
        • Arch Manning has 865 passing yards, 7 TDs, 3 INTs and an 82.9 average QBR through four games.
        • Oklahoma's official report lists multiple OL absences/doubtfuls plus starting-unit losses at DB, LB, WR and RB.
        • Oklahoma's defense has allowed -0.163 EPA/play, slightly better than Texas's -0.135, and can keep this inside the number.
      Show all 20 picks
      1. Under 41 total points
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

        Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Pace is modest at 27.68 seconds/play for Texas and 29.07 for Oklahoma; Oklahoma produces only 1.81 points per drive.
        • Pinnacle reference is 40.5 at -116 near kickoff; ProphetX's 41 supplies the key half-point while remaining inside the price and size gates.
        • Most likely loss: Texas converts its +0.2137 offensive EPA/play and 3.13 points per drive into 30-plus points, with Oklahoma adding enough for 42.
      2. 1st-half total under 20.5 points
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 54¢ on Kalshi

        Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Recent-three points per drive: Texas 2.25, Oklahoma 1.08; five drives each projects roughly 17 points.
        • EPA script still favors Texas, yet Oklahoma's recent offensive EPA is negative; a one-sided script can suppress total possessions.
        • Four-game samples lack direct first-half scoring splits and include large nonconference outliers.
      3. Texas Longhorns under 40.5 total points
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

        House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • under 40.5 wins at 40; under 40 pushes at 40, so the half-point contract strictly dominates that whole-number rung on the same venue.
        • Historical NCAAF exact-total frequency: 170 of 11,091 games finished exactly 40 points, 1.533%.
        • The 1.533% exact-40 estimate is league-wide historical frequency, not matchup-specific and not a guarantee of current scoring distribution.
      4. Game total under 40.5
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

        Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Pinnacle corroborates the 40.5 total with under +101, supporting the low-side direction.
        • Texas averages +0.214 EPA/play and Oklahoma -0.029; both defenses allow negative EPA, favoring a Texas-control script.
        • The 27.5/28.9-second paces and Oklahoma's 45.5% success rate temper the recent combined scoring average.
        • Most likely loss: Texas and Oklahoma reach 41+ through efficient red-zone drives or a defensive touchdown.
      5. Total Points under 39
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 46¢ on ProphetX

        Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • only 2026 scoring baseline is Texas 24.7 plus Oklahoma 12.3, or 37.0 combined across three games each.
        • Sharp sportsbook reference is 40.5, leaving ProphetX's 39 rung below the external market while the projection stays below it.
        • Most likely loss: Texas converts explosive drives and Oklahoma clears its 15.5 team-total anchor, producing 40 or more.
      6. Game total under 39.5
        −100%Lost

        Taken at −115 on DraftKings

        Long WeekDown 2% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Oklahoma averages -0.029 offensive EPA/play and 22.0 points per game; Texas allows -0.132 defensive EPA/play and 13.3 points per game.
        • The recent quality-opponent sample is suppressive: Oklahoma scored 10 against Michigan, while Texas-Tennessee totaled 37.
        • Both teams last played September 26, creating a full two-week preparation window and similar 27.7-to-29.1-second pace profiles.
        • Texas averages 0.214 offensive EPA/play and 33.3 points per game, so one efficient Longhorn start can break a 39.5 total.
      7. Texas Longhorns first-half spread NO 2.5
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 40¢ on Kalshi

        Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • 2,481 2024, 26 regular/postseason CFB finals produce SD_full 15.83; square-root scaling gives SD_1H 11.19, not 7.92.
        • Texas averages +20.0 margin versus Oklahoma +6.0 through four games; EPA/play is +0.214 versus −0.029 and points/drive 3.129 versus 1.811.
        • Blending those profiles with the sharp full-game Texas −7.5 reference gives μ_1H ≈ +4.5; N(4.5, 11.19²) gives Texas-NO at 2.5 about 43%.
        • The 2.5 rung sits immediately below college’s most frequent observed winning margin: 3 occurred 213 times; that discrete mass can make YES more likely than the smooth CDF.
      8. Texas Longhorns first-half spread NO 6.5
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 55¢ on Kalshi

        Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Pinnacle’s full-game Texas −7.5 anchors an independent reference; current profiles support a projected full margin near +9.0, hence μ_1H ≈ +4.5.
        • through four 2026 games, Texas averages 76.5 plays, +0.214 EPA/play and 3.129 points/drive; Oklahoma averages 65.0 plays, −0.029 EPA/play and 1.811 points/drive.
        • 1,853 completed 2024, 25 regular/postseason CFB finals produce SD_full 14.77; sqrt-half scaling gives SD_1H 10.44, not 7.39. Absolute margin masses lead with 3 (170), 7 (139), and 10 (84).
        • First-half margins are unobserved directly; additive-variance normal scaling is structural, not backtested first-half data.
      9. Rocky Beers over 39.5 receiving yards
        −100%Lost

        Taken at −114 on FanDuel

        Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • 7 of his last 10 appearances cleared 39.5 receiving yards.
        • Beers cleared the line in 3 of 4 2026 games, averaging 63.8 receiving yards.
        • FanDuel -114 implies 53.3%; my estimated hit probability is 59%, a 5.7-point margin.
        • Oklahoma's defense leads this matchup in defensive EPA allowed per play at -0.1627.
      10. John Mateer over 184.5 passing yards
        −100%Lost

        Taken at −114 on FanDuel

        Picks with pink pro readerUp 13% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • 7 of his last 10 appearances cleared 184.5 passing yards.
        • Mateer averages 220.8 passing yards across four 2026 games; all four cleared this line.
        • FanDuel -114 implies 53.3%; my estimated hit probability is 60%, a 6.7-point margin.
        • Texas owns a strong -0.1351 defensive EPA allowed per play, a difficult matchup.
      11. Oklahoma Sooners to winLong shot
        +260%Won

        Taken at +260 on DraftKings

        CFB Moonshot SinglesUp 44% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • 28% model, fair +257; rivalry/home marginal value.
        • Texas 4-0, 34.8 points.
      12. 1st-quarter total over 10.5 pointsLong shot
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 30¢ on Kalshi

        Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Texas and Oklahoma combine for recent offensive rates of 0.522 and 0.455 success, with both teams above 7% PROE.
        • Texas averages 76.5 offensive plays and 0.109 explosive rate, while Oklahoma contributes a 0.101 explosive rate.
        • My 43% estimate is materially above the Kalshi 30¢ quote; this exceeds the wider 1Q-total edge requirement.
        • A first quarter offers roughly five possessions per team; one punt, turnover, missed kick, or busted coverage can swing the result.
      13. Game first-half total over 19.5 points
        +89%Won

        Taken at 53¢ on Kalshi

        Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • 2026 weeks 1-4: Texas averaged 76.5 plays at 27.91 sec/play; Oklahoma 65.0 at 28.90.
        • Drive ledger: Texas produced 23 first-half drives in 4 games; Oklahoma 21; projected total is 11.0 first-half drives.
        • Mean PROE 7.8% and explosive rate 10.5% create the specific 6.0% uplift; no flat 50% scoring split.
        • Only a 1.0-point cushion over 19.5; one empty red-zone trip can decide the rung.
      14. Texas Longhorns spread −9
        −100%Lost

        Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

        Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
        Why it likes it
        • Texas -7.5 at -104 implies 50.98¢, then -8 drops only 1.48 points before the -8/-9 inversion; the broader ladder supports taking the liquid -9 quote.
        • QB gate cleared this wake: ESPN names Arch Manning and John Mateer, while latest passing rows show 19 and 34 attempts respectively.
        • Most likely loss: Texas wins by eight or fewer, leaving the -9 ticket short; exactly nine would push rather than win.

      Questions

      Who won Texas vs. Oklahoma?

      The Oklahoma won 27–24 on Saturday, Oct 10, 2026.

      App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.