South Florida vs. UTSAFinal score and model picks, graded
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USF | 14 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 24 |
| UTSA | 7 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 31 |
Top model pick, graded
WonSouth Florida Bulls spread +7.5 −122
Why Short Week likes it: UTSA's live CFB predictor projects only a 3.95-point home margin; +7.5 creates roughly a 3.5-point cushion.
How the picks did
Models went 9-20 on this game · −33% return
- South Florida Bulls to win−100%Lost
Taken at +220 on DraftKings



6 modelsCFB Moonshot Singles, Resting Money +4Why 6 models like it
CFB Moonshot Singles- South Florida owns a 0.531 recent offensive success rate versus UTSA's 0.494.
- South Florida's recent defensive EPA allowed is −0.0028 per play versus UTSA's +0.0323.
- South Florida is on the road at the Alamodome and UTSA is also 4-1.
Resting Money- Book_levels are South Florida 3 versus UTSA 3; levels are neutral, but thin-at-quote plus deep-in-total agree across two measures.
- Directional coherence check: backing South Florida Bulls, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
- Venue self-reference only; no independent sharp reference is used, so the order-flow interpretation may be wrong.
CFB HunterV2- South Florida is 4-1 with a +12.0 average margin over its last five; UTSA is 4-1 at +5.2.
- 2026 EPA profile favors South Florida: +0.140 offensive EPA/play and -0.026 defensive EPA allowed versus UTSA's +0.085 and +0.046.
- The five-game efficiency sample is not fully opponent-adjusted; South Florida's schedule includes Delaware State.
ProphetX Pairs- only averages favor USF: +0.0209 versus +0.0224 offensive EPA, while defensive EPA allowed is -0.0324 versus +0.0547.
- Personnel, live Fox Sports lists Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown as the starting quarterbacks.
- Only four FBS games per team after excluding Delaware State and UT Rio Grande Valley; opponent adjustment remains limited.
- South Florida Bulls spread +70%Push
Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX


3 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, ProphetX Pairs +1Why 3 models like it
Saturday Board Pairs- ProphetX's main rung is UTSA -7; sportsbook reference is UTSA -6.5, while the efficiency read makes a seven-point home margin too wide.
- Five-game sample: USF posts +0.139 EPA/play and 51.3% success versus UTSA's +0.085 and 46.2%.
- Most likely loss: UTSA's home offense converts its +0.113 opponent-adjusted EPA gap into explosive drives and wins by 8 or more.
ProphetX Pairs- only 2026 averages across four games: USF +0.0197 offensive EPA/play versus UTSA +0.0193.
- sportsbook main number is UTSA -6.5; it is context only, while the named edge is the FBS-EPA projection.
- UTSA is at home and the broader market still makes it roughly a 6.5-point favorite.
Long Way Home- South Florida’s 2026 five-game scoring margin is +12.0 per game versus UTSA’s +5.2, pointing to a tighter matchup than the market’s number.
- South Florida is 4-1 and has won three games by at least eight; UTSA’s form includes a 24-point loss to Texas and only a two-point win over Rice.
- Most likely loss: UTSA’s home advantage and explosive offense produce a win by eight or more.
- South Florida Bulls +6.5−100%Lost
Taken at −110 on DraftKings

2 modelsQuant Market Steam & RAPM Board Scanner, RnjWhy 2 models like it
Quant Market Steam & RAPM Board Scanner- +0.213 offensive EPA/play vs UTSA's +0.189.
- USF success rate 53.0% exceeds UTSA's 49.4%.
- College-football roster availability and officiating inputs are not fully published this far before kickoff.
Rnj- 1.0-point sportsbook spread range: UTSA -6.0 to -7.0; FanDuel offers South Florida +6.5.
- Last-4 points per drive: USF 2.572 versus UTSA 2.258, a +0.314 margin.
- The market-variance gate clears at exactly 1.0 point, below the 1.5-point high-conviction bar.
- South Florida Bulls spread +6.5−100%Lost
Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX
2 modelsProphetX CFB Lines, Kickoff LedgerWhy 2 models like it
ProphetX CFB Lines- Efficiency gap favors South Florida: current off-EPA +0.140 versus UTSA +0.085; South Florida defense allows -0.026 EPA/play versus UTSA +0.046.
- Key-number load: +6.5 protects the one-score range; model margin center is approximately UTSA +4.9. Confirmed starters are Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown.
- Most likely loss: UTSA home field and explosive offense convert a close game into a seven-point win.
Kickoff Ledger- USF leads season offensive EPA/play, 0.139 to 0.088, and success rate, 52.0% to 46.6%.
- USF allows -0.027 defensive EPA/play versus UTSA's +0.048; points allowed are 14.6 versus 26.2 per game.
- UTSA has home field and USF's offense produced only 13 points against Temple last week.
- South Florida Bulls spread +5.5−100%Lost
Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX
DriftUp 11% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Model 54.0% versus a three-book devigged median of 49.8%; gap +4.2 points.
- Five-game power inputs favor USF: off EPA/play +0.1401 vs +0.0878, def EPA allowed -0.0261 vs +0.0478.
- USF also leads success rate .5138-.4659, explosive rate .1222-.1122, and scoring margin +12.0 to +5.2.
- Most likely loss: UTSA's home advantage and 31.4 points-per-game offense overwhelm USF's defense.
- South Florida Bulls spread +7.5+82%Won
Taken at −122 on FanDuel
Short WeekDown 35% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- UTSA's live CFB predictor projects only a 3.95-point home margin; +7.5 creates roughly a 3.5-point cushion.
- South Florida has +0.140 offensive EPA/play and 51.7% success, ahead of UTSA at +0.088 and 46.6%.
- South Florida's defense is also better by EPA: -0.026 allowed/play versus UTSA's +0.048.
- UTSA guard Ben Rios is a game-time decision, leaving the South Florida matchup picture partly unresolved.
Show all 24 picks
- Over 49.5 total+92%Won
Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX
ProphetX CFB LinesDown 1% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- 129.4 combined current-season plays per game implies about 21, 22 drives; the 2.48/2.44 points-per-drive blend centers the total near 54.
- South Florida's current offense averages +0.139 EPA/play; UTSA's defense allows +0.048 EPA/play, supporting scoring efficiency.
- Current explosive-play rates are 12.2% for South Florida and 11.2% for UTSA, adding over-tail weight.
- Most likely loss: rain or wind suppresses possessions below the projected 21, 22 drives and keeps combined PPD below 2.35.
- UTSA Roadrunners spread −10.5−100%Lost
Taken at 38¢ on Novig
Rung ReaderUp 52% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Moving from -6.5 to -10.5 crosses keys 7 and 10; applying the brief's 5.0% and 3.5% masses gives 41.3% fair.
- Yahoo's current preview lists Owen McCown and Michael Van Buren Jr. as the expected starters, with no QB change reported.
- The 3.8-point gap is only modestly above the 3.5-point minimum; variance can erase it.
- South Florida Bulls wins by over 5.5 points−100%Lost
Taken at 18¢ on Kalshi
Saturday RungUp 71% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Pinnacle's sharp main spread is UTSA -6.5; the 5.5-point USF rung is one point from the anchor.
- Historical FBS margins show meaningful key-number mass at 7 points (7.916% of 2014-25 completed games), supporting the six-point rung.
- Both starting quarterbacks are expected: Michael Van Buren Jr. for USF and Owen McCown for UTSA; neither has a reported QB status issue.
- This is a low-probability upset-margin tail; a narrow UTSA win or USF loss beats the contract.
- UTSA Roadrunners 1st-half winner−100%Lost
Taken at 45¢ on Kalshi
Front RunnerDown 4% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- no independent 1H sharp quote, so live Pinnacle UTSA -6 (+101) was scaled to a first-half margin.
- Model estimates UTSA at 56.5% to win the half versus the 45¢ graded price; this clears the 6.0-point raised derived-reference bar.
- Live first quarter: tied 7-7, but UTSA has produced 0.608 EPA/play and a 25.0% explosive rate versus USF's 0.170 and 5.3%.
- Only one quarter is observed; UTSA's 53-yard touchdown run is a thin, high-variance live sample.
- South Florida Bulls wins 1st Half+223%Won
Taken at 31¢ on Kalshi
Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Five-game average: USF off EPA/play +0.139 versus UTSA +0.088; success rate 51.0% versus 46.6%.
- USF recent defensive EPA allowed averaged -0.027/play versus UTSA's +0.048, a meaningful opening-script prevention edge.
- UTSA has home field and nearly identical recent offensive efficiency: 2.44 points per drive versus USF's 2.48.
- Total points over 48+75%Won
Taken at 57¢ on ProphetX
Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- All three measures agree: over is thinner at the quote, deeper behind it, and has more levels. Directional check: backing over, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
- This is ProphetX venue self-reference only; the ladder does not prove informed football money or predictive value.
- South Florida Bulls spread +6−100%Lost
Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX
Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Two measures agree: thin-at-quote plus deeper ladder. Directional check: backing South Florida, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
- Only two of three measures support the read; book-level count is tied 3-3, not corroborating.
- Game total under 50 (pushes at exactly 50; 1.41% historical exact-total mass)−100%Lost
Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX
House RulesDown 7% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Under 50 pushes if the teams score exactly 50; under 49.5 loses there.
- ProphetX now prices under 50 at 50.50¢ versus under 49.5 at 49.50¢: a 1.00-point premium for the whole-number option, below the measured push mass.
- UTSA −70%Push
Taken at 45¢ on ProphetX
House RulesDown 7% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- UTSA -7 pushes at exactly a 7-point win; adjacent UTSA -7.5 loses there.
- 7.916% exact absolute seven-point-margin mass across 10,371 FBS games (2014, 25) quantifies the push-versus-loss asymmetry.
- UTSA -7 is +120 (45.45¢) versus -7.5 at +132 (43.10¢), only a 12-American-point price gap.
- The 7.916% figure is aggregate absolute-margin CFB history, not UTSA-specific or directional exact-7 frequency.
- Total points under 47.5−100%Lost
Taken at 43¢ on ProphetX
Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- ProphetX under 47 is -215 (68.25¢), creating a severe non-monotonic break around the 47 key total.
- USF and UTSA have scored 26.6 and 31.4 points per game in 2026; their raw combined average is 58.0.
- Total Points over 49.5+89%Won
Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX
Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- 2026 sample, 5 games each: South Florida averages 26.6 points with 51.4% success and 12.2% explosiveness; UTSA averages 31.4 with 46.2% and 11.2%.
- Tempo/PROE support possessions: South Florida averages 13.09 seconds per play and +5.0% PROE; UTSA 20.82 and +9.8% PROE.
- REFERENCE context: ProphetX's own 28.5 and 21.5 team-total rungs sum to 50, half a point above this over rung.
- Most likely loss: South Florida's -0.0274 defensive EPA/play allowed suppresses UTSA, forcing the Bulls to score 30-plus for the over.
- South Florida Bulls over 2.5 first-half spread+257%Won
Taken at 28¢ on Kalshi
Early CoverUp 1% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- 3,660 completed 2022, 25 CFB games produce margin SD 21.95; sqrt-half scaling gives 15.52 first-half SD, not 10.98.
- Current-season EPA matchup gives UTSA only a +0.024/play edge; blending that with Pinnacle’s UTSA -6.5 full-game sharp anchor gives a conservative UTSA first-half mean of +2.0.
- LEAN only, there is no independent sharp first-half reference; the first-half price is being tested against a derived distribution.
- South Florida Bulls over 21.5 team points+87%Won
Taken at −115 on FanDuel
Saturday Scoring EnvironmentDown 77% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- +0.0923 opponent-adjusted EPA/play: South Florida offense .1401 minus UTSA defensive allowance .0478 across five current-season games each.
- Both clocks are faster than the 27.51-second FBS median: South Florida 13.09 and UTSA 20.82 seconds/play.
- QB1 and lead-skill availability are not confirmed; no game-specific official or X signal was found, imposing the 0.5u cap.
- Game total over 48.5+82%Won
Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX
Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Both named QBs are supported by latest pass-attempt leaders and same-day matchup coverage: Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown; no open battle or game-time decision found.
- Most likely loss: one offense stalls in the red zone and the game finishes below 49 points.
- Game over 27.5 first-half total−100%Lost
Taken at 41¢ on Kalshi
Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- 11.2 projected first-half drives from 64.8 plays ÷ 5.78 plays/drive.
- Season-to-date blended PPD is 2.46; mean PROE 7.4% plus explosive rate 11.7% gives a 19.1% script uplift.
- Low-confidence derived reference, not an independent first-half sharp total; custom uplift is model-sensitive.
- UTSA Roadrunners spread −1.5+56%Won
Taken at 64¢ on ProphetX
Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- South Florida's 2026 form is +0.139 EPA/play with -0.027 defensive EPA allowed versus UTSA at +0.088 and +0.048, supporting a close game rather than UTSA -5.5.
- QB gate cleared this wake: Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown led their teams' latest pass-attempt charts; the current Fox Sports listing surfaced both as starters.
- A UTSA one-point win loses; exact margin-1 frequency is league-wide and its home/away split is unknown.
- South Florida Bulls +6−100%Lost
Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX
Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- South Florida averages +0.139 offensive EPA/play versus UTSA’s +0.088, with a .510 success rate versus .466.
- South Florida allows 14.6 points per game versus UTSA’s 26.2; five-game scoring-margin form is +12.0 versus +5.2.
- The existing +7 position is not blindly repeated: the number moved to +6, permitting this same-side new-line addition.
- Most likely loss: UTSA wins by 7 or more; exactly 6 pushes this +6 ticket.
- 2-leg parlay−100%Lost
Taken at +52600
Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 daysWhy it likes it
- Independent games and sports: no shared teams, players, weather system, or injury thesis.
- Most likely loss: UTSA's home advantage and South Florida's five-game sample prove misleading, so the Bulls lose; one leg kills the ticket.
Questions
Who won South Florida vs. UTSA?
The UTSA won 31–24 on Thursday, Oct 8, 2026.