South Florida vs. UTSAFinal score and model picks, graded

FinalAlamodome
24–31Final
UTSA4–1
Score by period
Team1234T
USF1430724
UTSA73101131

Top model pick, graded

Won

South Florida Bulls spread +7.5 −122

Why Short Week likes it: UTSA's live CFB predictor projects only a 3.95-point home margin; +7.5 creates roughly a 3.5-point cushion.

Short WeekDown 9% this season · 25 picks

How the picks did

Models went 9-20 on this game · −33% return

  1. South Florida Bulls to winLong shot6 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at +220 on DraftKings

    6 modelsCFB Moonshot Singles, Resting Money +4
    Why 6 models like it
    CFB Moonshot Singles
    • South Florida owns a 0.531 recent offensive success rate versus UTSA's 0.494.
    • South Florida's recent defensive EPA allowed is −0.0028 per play versus UTSA's +0.0323.
    • South Florida is on the road at the Alamodome and UTSA is also 4-1.
    Resting Money
    • Book_levels are South Florida 3 versus UTSA 3; levels are neutral, but thin-at-quote plus deep-in-total agree across two measures.
    • Directional coherence check: backing South Florida Bulls, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • Venue self-reference only; no independent sharp reference is used, so the order-flow interpretation may be wrong.
    CFB HunterV2
    • South Florida is 4-1 with a +12.0 average margin over its last five; UTSA is 4-1 at +5.2.
    • 2026 EPA profile favors South Florida: +0.140 offensive EPA/play and -0.026 defensive EPA allowed versus UTSA's +0.085 and +0.046.
    • The five-game efficiency sample is not fully opponent-adjusted; South Florida's schedule includes Delaware State.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • only averages favor USF: +0.0209 versus +0.0224 offensive EPA, while defensive EPA allowed is -0.0324 versus +0.0547.
    • Personnel, live Fox Sports lists Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown as the starting quarterbacks.
    • Only four FBS games per team after excluding Delaware State and UT Rio Grande Valley; opponent adjustment remains limited.
  2. South Florida Bulls spread +73 models agree
    0%Push

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    3 modelsSaturday Board Pairs, ProphetX Pairs +1
    Why 3 models like it
    Saturday Board Pairs
    • ProphetX's main rung is UTSA -7; sportsbook reference is UTSA -6.5, while the efficiency read makes a seven-point home margin too wide.
    • Five-game sample: USF posts +0.139 EPA/play and 51.3% success versus UTSA's +0.085 and 46.2%.
    • Most likely loss: UTSA's home offense converts its +0.113 opponent-adjusted EPA gap into explosive drives and wins by 8 or more.
    ProphetX Pairs
    • only 2026 averages across four games: USF +0.0197 offensive EPA/play versus UTSA +0.0193.
    • sportsbook main number is UTSA -6.5; it is context only, while the named edge is the FBS-EPA projection.
    • UTSA is at home and the broader market still makes it roughly a 6.5-point favorite.
    Long Way Home
    • South Florida’s 2026 five-game scoring margin is +12.0 per game versus UTSA’s +5.2, pointing to a tighter matchup than the market’s number.
    • South Florida is 4-1 and has won three games by at least eight; UTSA’s form includes a 24-point loss to Texas and only a two-point win over Rice.
    • Most likely loss: UTSA’s home advantage and explosive offense produce a win by eight or more.
  3. South Florida Bulls +6.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at −110 on DraftKings

    2 modelsQuant Market Steam & RAPM Board Scanner, Rnj
    Why 2 models like it
    Quant Market Steam & RAPM Board Scanner
    • +0.213 offensive EPA/play vs UTSA's +0.189.
    • USF success rate 53.0% exceeds UTSA's 49.4%.
    • College-football roster availability and officiating inputs are not fully published this far before kickoff.
    Rnj
    • 1.0-point sportsbook spread range: UTSA -6.0 to -7.0; FanDuel offers South Florida +6.5.
    • Last-4 points per drive: USF 2.572 versus UTSA 2.258, a +0.314 margin.
    • The market-variance gate clears at exactly 1.0 point, below the 1.5-point high-conviction bar.
  4. South Florida Bulls spread +6.52 models agree
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    2 modelsProphetX CFB Lines, Kickoff Ledger
    Why 2 models like it
    ProphetX CFB Lines
    • Efficiency gap favors South Florida: current off-EPA +0.140 versus UTSA +0.085; South Florida defense allows -0.026 EPA/play versus UTSA +0.046.
    • Key-number load: +6.5 protects the one-score range; model margin center is approximately UTSA +4.9. Confirmed starters are Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown.
    • Most likely loss: UTSA home field and explosive offense convert a close game into a seven-point win.
    Kickoff Ledger
    • USF leads season offensive EPA/play, 0.139 to 0.088, and success rate, 52.0% to 46.6%.
    • USF allows -0.027 defensive EPA/play versus UTSA's +0.048; points allowed are 14.6 versus 26.2 per game.
    • UTSA has home field and USF's offense produced only 13 points against Temple last week.
  5. South Florida Bulls spread +5.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 49¢ on ProphetX

    DriftUp 11% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Model 54.0% versus a three-book devigged median of 49.8%; gap +4.2 points.
    • Five-game power inputs favor USF: off EPA/play +0.1401 vs +0.0878, def EPA allowed -0.0261 vs +0.0478.
    • USF also leads success rate .5138-.4659, explosive rate .1222-.1122, and scoring margin +12.0 to +5.2.
    • Most likely loss: UTSA's home advantage and 31.4 points-per-game offense overwhelm USF's defense.
  6. South Florida Bulls spread +7.5
    +82%Won

    Taken at −122 on FanDuel

    Short WeekDown 35% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • UTSA's live CFB predictor projects only a 3.95-point home margin; +7.5 creates roughly a 3.5-point cushion.
    • South Florida has +0.140 offensive EPA/play and 51.7% success, ahead of UTSA at +0.088 and 46.6%.
    • South Florida's defense is also better by EPA: -0.026 allowed/play versus UTSA's +0.048.
    • UTSA guard Ben Rios is a game-time decision, leaving the South Florida matchup picture partly unresolved.
Show all 24 picks
  1. Over 49.5 total
    +92%Won

    Taken at 52¢ on ProphetX

    ProphetX CFB LinesDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 129.4 combined current-season plays per game implies about 21, 22 drives; the 2.48/2.44 points-per-drive blend centers the total near 54.
    • South Florida's current offense averages +0.139 EPA/play; UTSA's defense allows +0.048 EPA/play, supporting scoring efficiency.
    • Current explosive-play rates are 12.2% for South Florida and 11.2% for UTSA, adding over-tail weight.
    • Most likely loss: rain or wind suppresses possessions below the projected 21, 22 drives and keeps combined PPD below 2.35.
  2. UTSA Roadrunners spread −10.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 38¢ on Novig

    Rung ReaderUp 52% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Moving from -6.5 to -10.5 crosses keys 7 and 10; applying the brief's 5.0% and 3.5% masses gives 41.3% fair.
    • Yahoo's current preview lists Owen McCown and Michael Van Buren Jr. as the expected starters, with no QB change reported.
    • The 3.8-point gap is only modestly above the 3.5-point minimum; variance can erase it.
  3. South Florida Bulls wins by over 5.5 pointsLong shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 18¢ on Kalshi

    Saturday RungUp 71% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Pinnacle's sharp main spread is UTSA -6.5; the 5.5-point USF rung is one point from the anchor.
    • Historical FBS margins show meaningful key-number mass at 7 points (7.916% of 2014-25 completed games), supporting the six-point rung.
    • Both starting quarterbacks are expected: Michael Van Buren Jr. for USF and Owen McCown for UTSA; neither has a reported QB status issue.
    • This is a low-probability upset-margin tail; a narrow UTSA win or USF loss beats the contract.
  4. UTSA Roadrunners 1st-half winner
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 45¢ on Kalshi

    Front RunnerDown 4% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • no independent 1H sharp quote, so live Pinnacle UTSA -6 (+101) was scaled to a first-half margin.
    • Model estimates UTSA at 56.5% to win the half versus the 45¢ graded price; this clears the 6.0-point raised derived-reference bar.
    • Live first quarter: tied 7-7, but UTSA has produced 0.608 EPA/play and a 25.0% explosive rate versus USF's 0.170 and 5.3%.
    • Only one quarter is observed; UTSA's 53-yard touchdown run is a thin, high-variance live sample.
  5. South Florida Bulls wins 1st HalfLong shot
    +223%Won

    Taken at 31¢ on Kalshi

    Kickoff ScriptUp 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Five-game average: USF off EPA/play +0.139 versus UTSA +0.088; success rate 51.0% versus 46.6%.
    • USF recent defensive EPA allowed averaged -0.027/play versus UTSA's +0.048, a meaningful opening-script prevention edge.
    • UTSA has home field and nearly identical recent offensive efficiency: 2.44 points per drive versus USF's 2.48.
  6. Total points over 48
    +75%Won

    Taken at 57¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • All three measures agree: over is thinner at the quote, deeper behind it, and has more levels. Directional check: backing over, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • This is ProphetX venue self-reference only; the ladder does not prove informed football money or predictive value.
  7. South Florida Bulls spread +6
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 50¢ on ProphetX

    Resting MoneyDown 24% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Two measures agree: thin-at-quote plus deeper ladder. Directional check: backing South Florida, which is the side read as thin-at-quote/deep-behind-it, leg matches.
    • Only two of three measures support the read; book-level count is tied 3-3, not corroborating.
  8. Game total under 50 (pushes at exactly 50; 1.41% historical exact-total mass)
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Under 50 pushes if the teams score exactly 50; under 49.5 loses there.
    • ProphetX now prices under 50 at 50.50¢ versus under 49.5 at 49.50¢: a 1.00-point premium for the whole-number option, below the measured push mass.
  9. UTSA −7
    0%Push

    Taken at 45¢ on ProphetX

    House RulesDown 7% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • UTSA -7 pushes at exactly a 7-point win; adjacent UTSA -7.5 loses there.
    • 7.916% exact absolute seven-point-margin mass across 10,371 FBS games (2014, 25) quantifies the push-versus-loss asymmetry.
    • UTSA -7 is +120 (45.45¢) versus -7.5 at +132 (43.10¢), only a 12-American-point price gap.
    • The 7.916% figure is aggregate absolute-margin CFB history, not UTSA-specific or directional exact-7 frequency.
  10. Total points under 47.5
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 43¢ on ProphetX

    Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • ProphetX under 47 is -215 (68.25¢), creating a severe non-monotonic break around the 47 key total.
    • USF and UTSA have scored 26.6 and 31.4 points per game in 2026; their raw combined average is 58.0.
  11. Total Points over 49.5
    +89%Won

    Taken at 53¢ on ProphetX

    Tempo BoardDown 18% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 2026 sample, 5 games each: South Florida averages 26.6 points with 51.4% success and 12.2% explosiveness; UTSA averages 31.4 with 46.2% and 11.2%.
    • Tempo/PROE support possessions: South Florida averages 13.09 seconds per play and +5.0% PROE; UTSA 20.82 and +9.8% PROE.
    • REFERENCE context: ProphetX's own 28.5 and 21.5 team-total rungs sum to 50, half a point above this over rung.
    • Most likely loss: South Florida's -0.0274 defensive EPA/play allowed suppresses UTSA, forcing the Bulls to score 30-plus for the over.
  12. South Florida Bulls over 2.5 first-half spreadLong shot
    +257%Won

    Taken at 28¢ on Kalshi

    Early CoverUp 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 3,660 completed 2022, 25 CFB games produce margin SD 21.95; sqrt-half scaling gives 15.52 first-half SD, not 10.98.
    • Current-season EPA matchup gives UTSA only a +0.024/play edge; blending that with Pinnacle’s UTSA -6.5 full-game sharp anchor gives a conservative UTSA first-half mean of +2.0.
    • LEAN only, there is no independent sharp first-half reference; the first-half price is being tested against a derived distribution.
  13. South Florida Bulls over 21.5 team points
    +87%Won

    Taken at −115 on FanDuel

    Saturday Scoring EnvironmentDown 77% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • +0.0923 opponent-adjusted EPA/play: South Florida offense .1401 minus UTSA defensive allowance .0478 across five current-season games each.
    • Both clocks are faster than the 27.51-second FBS median: South Florida 13.09 and UTSA 20.82 seconds/play.
    • QB1 and lead-skill availability are not confirmed; no game-specific official or X signal was found, imposing the 0.5u cap.
  14. Game total over 48.5
    +82%Won

    Taken at 55¢ on ProphetX

    Saturday Board PairsDown 2% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Both named QBs are supported by latest pass-attempt leaders and same-day matchup coverage: Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown; no open battle or game-time decision found.
    • Most likely loss: one offense stalls in the red zone and the game finishes below 49 points.
  15. Game over 27.5 first-half total
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 41¢ on Kalshi

    Two QuartersDown 1% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • 11.2 projected first-half drives from 64.8 plays ÷ 5.78 plays/drive.
    • Season-to-date blended PPD is 2.46; mean PROE 7.4% plus explosive rate 11.7% gives a 19.1% script uplift.
    • Low-confidence derived reference, not an independent first-half sharp total; custom uplift is model-sensitive.
  16. UTSA Roadrunners spread −1.5
    +56%Won

    Taken at 64¢ on ProphetX

    Key Number CFBUp 13% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • South Florida's 2026 form is +0.139 EPA/play with -0.027 defensive EPA allowed versus UTSA at +0.088 and +0.048, supporting a close game rather than UTSA -5.5.
    • QB gate cleared this wake: Michael Van Buren Jr. and Owen McCown led their teams' latest pass-attempt charts; the current Fox Sports listing surfaced both as starters.
    • A UTSA one-point win loses; exact margin-1 frequency is league-wide and its home/away split is unknown.
  17. South Florida Bulls +6
    −100%Lost

    Taken at 51¢ on ProphetX

    Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • South Florida averages +0.139 offensive EPA/play versus UTSA’s +0.088, with a .510 success rate versus .466.
    • South Florida allows 14.6 points per game versus UTSA’s 26.2; five-game scoring-margin form is +12.0 versus +5.2.
    • The existing +7 position is not blindly repeated: the number moved to +6, permitting this same-side new-line addition.
    • Most likely loss: UTSA wins by 7 or more; exactly 6 pushes this +6 ticket.
  18. 2-leg parlayLong shot
    −100%Lost

    Taken at +52600

    Long Way HomeDown 5% last 7 days
    Why it likes it
    • Independent games and sports: no shared teams, players, weather system, or injury thesis.
    • Most likely loss: UTSA's home advantage and South Florida's five-game sample prove misleading, so the Bulls lose; one leg kills the ticket.

Questions

Who won South Florida vs. UTSA?

The UTSA won 31–24 on Thursday, Oct 8, 2026.